Interpretation of Analogy in the Crime of Possession of a New Psychoactive Substance

  • Carissa Tita Zhafirah Universitas Brawijaya
  • Setiawan Noerdajasakti Universitas Brawijaya
  • Abdul Madjid Universitas Brawijaya

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of analogy interpretation by judges in the case of possession of new psychoactive substances, especially in Decision Number 1352/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Mdn on behalf of the Defendant Lindawati. The background of this research departs from the delay of the Indonesian legal system in responding to social changes, especially related to the phenomenon of the spread of new psychoactive substances that have not been explicitly regulated in laws and regulations. This study uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Analysis was carried out on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using anticipatory and teleological interpretation methods. The results of the study showed that the Panel of Judges used Article 62 of the Psychotropic Law to punish the Defendant, even though the substance ketamine was not listed in the official psychotropic appendix. This action reflects the findings of the law through analogy, which is doctrinally contrary to the principle of legality in criminal law. Nevertheless, from a progressive legal perspective, the application reflects a response to rapidly changing social realities as well as the need for adaptive legal protection. This study concludes that although analogies in criminal law are prohibited, their application in the context of a legal vacuum for psychoactive substances can only be understood as an effort to realize substantive justice and public protection through a progressive approach in criminal law enforcement.


Keywords: New Psychoactive Substances; Legal Discovery; Analogy

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 0 of 54 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/ojs.unud.ac.id/lib/pkp/classes/cache/FileCache.inc.php on line 90

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Book:
A.R. Sujono. 2011. Comments and Discussion of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Djatmika, Prija. 2024. . . Legal Correlation and Social Change: In a Theoretical Perspective. Malang: Brawijaya University.
Hasnan. 1987. Translation of Criminal Law 1: Material Criminal Law General Section. Bandung: Alumni.
Moeljanto. 2008. Criminal Code. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2006. Legal Sciences. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Sapardjaja, Komariah Emong. 2002. The Teaching of Material Lawlessness in Indonesian Criminal Law (Case Study on Its Application and Development in Jurisprudence). Bandung: Alumni.
Wignjotosoebroto, Soetandyo. 2013. Paradigm Shift in Social and Legal Studies. Malang: Setara Press.

Law:
Law Number 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics
Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics
Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code

Journal:
Christianto, Hwian. 2011. "Progressive Legal Interpretation in Criminal Cases." Journal of the Law Pulpit 23 (3): 431–45.
Christina. 2020. "Law Enforcement Breakthroughs in Dealing with the Threat of New Psychoactive Substances (NPS): Adoption of International Legal Provisions.Journal of National Resilience Strategic Studies 3 (1): 75.
Hadmanto, Aditya. 2021. "The Position of New Types of Narcotics in the Evidence of the Narcotics Law No.35 of 2009." Badamai Law Journal 6 (1): 196–214.
Hardjanto, Aris. 2016. "The Benefits of Analogy in Criminal Law to Address Modernized Crime." Journal of Jurisprudence 31 (2): 221–22.
Mujahideen, AM. 2007. "Progressive Law: A Way Out of the Decline of the Law in Indonesia." Varia Judiciary, 58.
Pratama, Ivan Maulana, Muhammad Reza Irawan, Ariel Emilio Susilo, and Rizky Maulana Hakim. 2020. "Legal Regulation of New Types of Narcotics That Have Not Been Registered." Independent Justice 6 (1): 25–28.
Laughter, Alfredo. 2021. "The Principle of Legality of the Crime of Misuse of New Psychoactive Substances in the Study of Criminal Law." Journal of Civil Medicine 5 (1): 162–72.
Riswanto, Muhammad Faisal. 2021. "New Types of Narcotics Abuse (Study of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics)." E-Print Uniska, 1–7.
Step, Zulfahmi Khairil. 2021. "Abuse of Methylone Use as a Narcotics Crime." E-Journal Unsrat, 1–14.
Susilo, Erwin. 2024. "Application of Theory in Essence in Interpreting Narcotics Crimes." Nagari Law Review 8 (1): 51–64.
Yunita, Adelia. 2014. "Juridical Analysis of New Types of Narcotics Crimes Based on Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics." JOM Faculty of Law 1 (2): 1–15.
Published
2025-07-15
How to Cite
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 0 of 26 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/ojs.unud.ac.id/lib/pkp/classes/cache/FileCache.inc.php on line 90 ZHAFIRAH, Carissa Tita; NOERDAJASAKTI, Setiawan; MADJID, Abdul. Interpretation of Analogy in the Crime of Possession of a New Psychoactive Substance. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), [S.l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 317-329, july 2025. ISSN 2502-3101. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jmhu/article/view/127763>. Date accessed: 26 july 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p02.
Section
Articles