Otonomi Kerajaan Denpasar dalam Perspektif Sejarah: Diplomasi, Perjuangan dan Kontribusinya Bagi Bangunan Negara-Bangsa
Abstract
Bali has unique and distinctive cultural customs that have a societal and cultural character that has been dominantly influenced by Hinduism. One proof of the influence of Hindu culture originating from India was the concept of a kingdom where the king was the ruler in regulating people's lives. Even though in the modern era, Bali has become a part of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, this does not mean that the traditional system that existed before has disappeared but rather that it can become part of the formation of social and cultural capital in the context of the nation-state building in Indonesia. The kingdom of Denpasar, previously called the kingdom of Badung as well was a cultural entity which played an significant role not only in the past, but also still be seen in the modern Bali era. It is not surprising to see that the existence of this kingdom cannot be separated from the understanding of the existence of autonomy, diplomacy and the struggles and its contribution that has been carried out from the past until now. There are some significant questions that will be addresed in this paper firstly: What and how did the kingdom or Puri Denpasar exist in the dynamics of society and culture in Bali in particular and in Indonesia in general? Secondly: how did collective memory develop so that Puri Denpasar had its authority as the diplomacy and struggle carried out to contribute to the nation-state building? Thirdly: what the meaning of kingdom in the modern Bali era particularly in the context of socio and cultural aspects so that these social and cultural values can be maintained regarding its existence from the past until now within the framework of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia? These are some significant questions that will be discussed in this study in an effort to have a better understanding about the role of the kingdom or Puri Denpasar in socio-cultural, economic and political aspects so that Puri Denpasar can maintain its existence until now in the context of nation-state building in the modern Indonesian state.
Downloads
References
Abdurrachman. (1984). Kedudukan Hukum Adat dalam Perundang-undangan Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.
Agung, I.C.N. "Lintasan Babad Badung". Paper tidak diterbitkan. (Denpasar, 1983). (Koleksi Puri Satria).
Agung, I.A.A. G. (1985). Dari Negara Indonesia Timur ke Republik Indonesia Serikat. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Agung, l.A.A.G. (1991). Bali in the 19th Century. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
“Algemeen Verslag van den Staf der Expeditie naar Bali 10 September-30 Oktober 1906”, dalam Indisch Militair Tijdschrift, Extra Bijlage No. 27. (Officielle Bijdrage van het Department van Oorlog in Nederlandsch-Indie).
Anderson, B.R. O’ G. (1972). “The Idea of Power in Javanese Culture”, dalam Claire Holt (ed). Culture and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (1964). Surat-surat Perdjandjian antara keradjaan-keradjaan di Bali dan Lombok dengan Pemerintah Hindia Belanda. Djakarta: Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Ardhana, I. K. (2013). “Pandangan Lokal versus Barat tentang Puputan Badung Ekspansi Imperialisme Modern Belanda dalam Konteks Bali”, dalam Jurnal Kajian Bali, Volume 03, Nomor 01. Denpasar: Pusat Kajian Bali-Universitas Udayana.
Ardhana, I. K. (1991). “Kerajaan Badung dalam Konteks Kolonial Belanda, 1827—1906”. (Laporan Penelitian). Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.
"Asal-Oesoel dari Tjokorde Ngoerah Agoeng dilahirkan di Denpasar, Landschap Badoeng (Zuid Bali) pada tahun 1921". (The Collection of Puri Satria).
Barth, F. (1993). Balinese Worlds. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Bourchier, D.(2010). “Kisah Adat dalam Imajinasi Politik Indonesia dan Kebangkitan Masa Kini” dalam James Davidson, David Henley, Sandra Moniaga. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Coedes, G. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Honolulu: East West Counter Press.
Creese, Helen. (1992). “The Early Balinese Polity: Interpreting The Evidence", Paper presented at the Ninth Biennnial ASAA Conference University of New England, July 6-9.
Creese, Helen. (1993). “The Problem of The Precolonial Balinese State", Makalah dipresentasikan pada Internasional Conference on Autonomous States in Southeast Asia and Korea at the 34th International Congress for Asian and North African Studies (ICANAS) August.
Darmiati (et al.). (1998). Otonomi Daerah di Hindia Belanda, 1903—1940. Jakarta: Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Furnivall, J. S. (1934). Netherlands India: A Study of Plural Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gallagher, John dan Ronald R. (1979). “Der Imperialismus des Freihandels”, dalam Hans-Ulrich Wehler. Imperialismus. Dusseldorf: Athenaum Verlag GmbH.
Geertz. C. (1980). Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth Century Bali. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Gullick, J.M., (1982). "The Condition of Having A Raja: A Review of Kerajaan by A.C. Miiner”, dalam Review of Indonesian and Malayan Affairs, Vol. 16, No. 2.
Heine G. R. (1956). Conceptions of State and Kinship in Southeast Asia. New York: Southeast Asia Program Department of Asian Studies, Cornell University.
Hobsbawn, E. and Terence R, (eds.). (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klooster, H. A. J. (1985). Indonesiers Schrijven Hun Geschidenis: De Ontwikkeling van de Indonesische Geschiedbeoefening in Theorie en Praktijk 1900—1980. Dordrecht-Holland: Foris Publication.
Klinken, G. v.(2010). “Kembalinya Para Sultan: Pentas Gerakan Komunitarian dalam Politik Lokal”, dalam James Davidson, David Henley, Sandra Moniaga. Adat dalam Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: KITLV dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Korn, V. E. (1924). Het Adatrecht van Bali. 's-Gravenhage: N.V. Handelsdrukkerij "De Ster".
Kraan, A.v.d. (1980). Lombok: Conquest, Colonization and Underdevelopment 1870-1940. Singapore: Heinemann Educational Books (Asia) Ltd.
Kraan, A.v.d (1983). "Bali: Slavery and Slave Trade", dalam Antony Reid (ed), Slave, Bondage and Dependency in Southeast Asia, New York: University of Queensland Press.
Kraan, A.v.d (1985). "Human Sacrifice in Bali: Sources, Notes and Commentary", dalam Indonesia, No. 40. Cornell: Southeast Asia Program. October.
Kraan, A.v.d (1993). "Trade, Rajas and Bandars in South Bali", dalam John Butcher and Howard Dick (eds.). The Rise and Fall of Revenue Farming: Business Elites and the Emergence of the Modern State in Southeast Asia, London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Kulke, H. (1986). ”The Early and The Imperial Kingdom in Southeast Asian History”, dalam David G. Marr and A.C. Milner (eds.). Southeast Asia in The 9th to 14th Centuries. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Leur, J. C. van. (1955). Indonesian Trade and Society. The Hague: Van Hoeve.
Locher-Scholten, Elsbeth. (1994). “Dutch Expansion in the Indonesian Archipelago around 1900 and the Imperialism Debate”, dalam ISEAS, Vol 25, 1 (Maret).
Lansing, J. S. (1983a). The Three Worlds of Bali. Princeton: Praeger Scientific.
Lansing ,J.S.1983b. “The Indianization of Bali", dalam Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 (March).
Mommsen, W. J.(1987). Imperialismus Theorien. Gottingen: Kleine Vandenhoeck-Reihe.
Monfries, J. (2018). Raja di Negara Republik: Kehidupan Sultan Hamengku Buwono IX dari Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Biography.
Popkin, S. (1979). The Rational Peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkely University Press.
Reid, A. (1988). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce, 1450—1680. Yale: Yale University Press.
Ronkel, P. H. S. (1902). “Dagverhaal van eene Reis van den Resident van Bali en Lombok Vergezeld van den Controleur voor de Politieke Aanrakingen en de Poenggawa’s Ida Bagoes Gelgel en Goesti Ktoet Djlantik naar Tabanan en Badoeng”, dalam Tijdschrift voor Indische Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde. s’-Hage: Martinus Nijhoff.
Scott, J. C., (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale: Yale University Press.
Schulte N. H. (1980). Macht, Mensen en Middelen: Patronen van Dynamiek in de Balische Politiek 1700-1840. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
Smail, J. (1961). “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia” dalam Journal of Southeast Asian History.
