Work Fatigue Analysis in Machining and Fabrication Department with NASA-TLX and Subjective Self Rating Test

  • Wulan Ayuningtyas Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Dene Herwanto
  • Candra Galang Gemilang Putra

Abstract

During the Covid-19 pandemic, production operators at PT. Riken Engineering Perkasa is required to complete work on time, resulting in the operator working longer hours and less rest time. PT. Riken Engineering Perkasa has a 6-day work system, has a working time of 9 hours/day with a break of 1 hour/day, except for Saturdays when it is 5 hours/day. In this case, the operator may have a work accident and do the same job repeatedly due to a defect in the product. Who conducted this research on production operators in the Machining and Fabrication department of PT. Riken Engineering Perkasa aims to analyze all production operators' work fatigue and mental workload during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research was conducted using the NASA-TLX method and the Subjective Self Rating Test. The mental workload of the very high indicator category was four operators, the high indicator category value was eight operators, and the low indicator category value was one operator. As for work fatigue, the average score for the medium category is eight operators, and the average value for the standard type is five operators. It can be concluded from the mental workload and work fatigue at PT. Riken Engineering Perkasa in the Machining and Fabrication department has a reasonably high category score; the results of these studies can be used as a reference for actions taken by PT. Riken Engineering Perkasa reduces mental workload and fatigue on operators by changing operator shifts and increasing rest hours. So that these operators can achieve optimal productivity with the quality of the products produced remains stable and maintained

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baiduri, 2008. Kaidah Dasar Penerapan Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Bridger, R.S., 2009. Introdution to Ergonomics. 3rd ed. New York: CRC Press.

Budiono, A.M.S., Jusuf, R.M.S. and Pusparini, A., 2003. Bunga Rampai Hyperkes dan Keselamatan Kerja. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Fraser, T.M., 1992. Stres & kepuasan kerja : acuan mencari alternatif untuk meningkatkan kepuasan kerja karyawan dalam lingkungan kerja yang sesuai. Jakarta: Pustaka Binaman Pressindo.

Hancock, P. and Meshkati, N., 1988. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.

Hidayat, T., 2003. Bahaya Laten Kelelahan Kerja. Jakarta: Harian Pikiran Rakyat.

Jex, H.R., 1988. Measuring Mental Workload: Problems, Progress, and Promises. In: Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.
Koesomowidjojo, S.R.M. and Mar’ih, R., 2017. Panduan Praktis Menyusun Analisis Beban Kerja. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses.

Munandar, A.S., 2014. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Suma’mur, P.K., 2009. Hiegiene Perusahaan dan Keselamatan Kerja. Jakarta: CV Sagung Seto.

Tarwaka, S., 2014a. Ergonomi Industri: Dasar-dasar Pengetahuan Ergonomi dan Aplikasi di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta: Harapan Press.

Tarwaka, S., 2014b. Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) : Manajemen dan Implementasi K3 di Tempat Kerja. Surakarta: Harapan Press.

Tarwaka, S., Bakri, S.H.A. and Sudiajeng, L., 2004. Ergonomi Untuk Keselamatan, Kesehatan Kerja dan Produktivitas. Surakarta: UNIBA PRESS.
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
AYUNINGTYAS, Wulan; HERWANTO, Dene; GEMILANG PUTRA, Candra Galang. Work Fatigue Analysis in Machining and Fabrication Department with NASA-TLX and Subjective Self Rating Test. Jurnal Ergonomi Indonesia (The Indonesian Journal of Ergonomic), [S.l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 135-142, dec. 2021. ISSN 2503-1716. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jei/article/view/80941>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/10.24843/JEI.2021.v07.i02.p06.