Studi Antropometri Mahasiswa Indonesia Bersuku Batak Dan Jawa
Abstrak
Anthropometric variations can be attributed to ethnic differences. Although Indonesia consists of many ethnic groups, anthropometric studies discussed this issue were still very limited. This research was conducted to collect anthropometric data of Indonesian Bataknese and Javanese college students. Comparisons of anthropometric dimensions between the two ethnic groups were also performed in this study. Anthropometric measurements of 58 dimensions were carried out on 286 male and 210 female college students. The measurement results were presented on descriptive statistics using mean, standard deviation, and percentile values. Dimension comparisons between sexes and ethnicities were also performed with the t-test and the Mann-Whitney test. The results of the study showed that significant differences were observed on almost all anthropometric dimensions, where the male participants had longer and wider dimensions than the females. The comparisons of male dimensions showed that significant differences were observed on the 13 dimensions, with the tendency of the Javanese participants to have more extended and wider leg dimensions. On the other hand, the Bataknese tended to have higher values on the dimensions associated with the width, such as foot width and mouth width. The comparison of the female dimensions indicated that significant differences existed on 27 dimensions, with the tendency of the Bataknese to have wider and longer dimensions on a rear-facing sitting position, while the Javanese tend to have wider and longer hand dimensions.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Referensi
Chuan, T. K., Hartono, M., Kumar, N. 2010. Anthropometry of the Singaporean and Indonesian populations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 40:757-766.
Heald, F. P. 1969. Nutrition (Introduction) In FP Heald (ed) : Adolescent Nutrition and Growth. New York: Meredith Corporation
Hu, H., Li, Z., Yan, J., Wang, X., Xiao, H., Duan, J., Zheng, L. 2007. Anthropometric measurement of the Chinese elderly living in the Beijing area. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 37:303 -311.
Iseri, A., Arslan, N. 2009. Estimated anthropometric measurements of Turkish adults
and effects of age and geographical regions. Int. J. Ind. Ergon, Vol. 39:860-865.
Klamkay, J., Sungkhapong, A., Yodpijit, N., Patterson, P.E. 2008. Anthropometry of Southern Thai populations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 38:111-118.
Lee Y. C., Chen C. H., Khoo L. P. 2018. A Pilot Study of Gender Differences on Anthropometric Measurements in Singapore Population. AHFE 2017 Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol 602. Springer, pp 42-51
Malla, K., Mall, T., Rao, S., Gauchan, E., Basnet, S., Koirala, D. P. 2012. Antropometric Measurements in Diff erent Ethnic groups of Nepalese New Borns, J Nepal Paediatr Soc, Vol. 32(1):1-8.
Mandahawi, N., Imrhan, S., Al-Shobaki, S., dan Sarder, B. 2008. Hand anthropometry survey for the Jordanian population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 38(11-12):966-976.
Mehrparvar, A. H., Mirmohammadi, S. J., Hafezi, R., Mostaghaci, M., dan Davari, M. H. 2015. Static anthropometric dimensions in a population of Iranian high school students: considering ethnic differences. Human factors, Vol. 57(3):447-460.
Nidiaputri, A. E., dan Ardiyanto, A. 2017. Hand Anthropometry of Indonesian Young Adult Females. Jurnal Ergonomi dan K3, Vol. 2(1):19-26.
Nurmianto, E. 1996. Ergonomi : Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT Guna Widya.
Perwira, S. M. 2001. International and Internal Migration in Indonesia, Paper prepared for “AD Hoc Expert Group Meeting in the Theme “Migration and Development Opportunities and Challenges for Poverty Reduction in Escape Region”
Pheasant, S., Haslegrave, C. M. 2006. Body Space : Anthropometry, Ergonomics, and the Design of Work, 3rd edition. Taylor dan Francis
Sirajuddin, S. M., Duggirala, R., Crawford, M. H. 1994. Population structure of the
Chenchu and other south Indian tribal groups: relationships between genetic,
anthropometric, dermatoglyphic, geographic, and linguistic distances. Hum.
Biol.: Int. Rec. Res., Vol. 66:865-884.
Wickens, C. D., Lee, J. D., Liu, Y., Becker, S. E. G. 2004. An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 2nd ed., New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Widyanti, A., Susanti, L., Sutalaksana, I. Z., Muslim, K. 2015. Ethnic differences in Indonesian anthropomtery data : Evidence from three different largest ethnics, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 47:72-78.