The ICT Maintenance Evaluation In Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia
Abstract
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia is an institution that has the authority to adjudicate constitutional examinations in Indonesia. In a government administration, every institution has the responsibility to manage its governance based on Information and Communication Technology (ICT). This work aims to evaluate the current maintenance flow in managing the video conference for the examination of petitioners, witnesses and remote experts. The evaluation result will be used to give recommendation to improve time, budget, and availability aspect of ICT Maintenance.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2010). The Six Sigma handbook. Mc Graw Hill. https://doi.org/10.1036/0071415963
[2] Roger W. Hoerl. (1998). Six Sigma and the Future of the Quality Profession. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26, 87–94.
[3] Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040210451679
[4] Antony, J., & Bañuelas, R. (2001). A strategy for survival. Manufacturing Engineer, 80(3), 119–121.
[5] Biehl, R. E. (2004). Six sigma for software. IEEE Software. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2004.1270765
[6] Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. Quality Progress (Vol. 34). https://doi.org/10.1036/0071376674
[7] Youssouf, A., Rachid, C., & Ion, V. (2014). Contribution to the Optimization of Strategy of Maintenance by Lean Six Sigma. Physics Procedia, 55, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.001
[8] José Fernando Gomes Requeijo, António João Pina da Costa Feliciano Abreu, João Manuel Ferreira Calado, & Ana Sofia Martins da Eira Dias. (2018). SIX SIGMA BUSINESS SCORECARD APPROACH TO SUPPORT MAINTENANCE PROJECTS IN A COLLABORATIVE CONTEXT. Research in Production and Development, 4(1), 82–97.
[2] Roger W. Hoerl. (1998). Six Sigma and the Future of the Quality Profession. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 26, 87–94.
[3] Antony, J., & Banuelas, R. (2002). Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program. Measuring Business Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040210451679
[4] Antony, J., & Bañuelas, R. (2001). A strategy for survival. Manufacturing Engineer, 80(3), 119–121.
[5] Biehl, R. E. (2004). Six sigma for software. IEEE Software. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2004.1270765
[6] Pande, P. S., Neuman, R. P., & Cavanagh, R. R. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance. Quality Progress (Vol. 34). https://doi.org/10.1036/0071376674
[7] Youssouf, A., Rachid, C., & Ion, V. (2014). Contribution to the Optimization of Strategy of Maintenance by Lean Six Sigma. Physics Procedia, 55, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.001
[8] José Fernando Gomes Requeijo, António João Pina da Costa Feliciano Abreu, João Manuel Ferreira Calado, & Ana Sofia Martins da Eira Dias. (2018). SIX SIGMA BUSINESS SCORECARD APPROACH TO SUPPORT MAINTENANCE PROJECTS IN A COLLABORATIVE CONTEXT. Research in Production and Development, 4(1), 82–97.
Published
2021-06-18
How to Cite
ALEXANDER, Ivan.
The ICT Maintenance Evaluation In Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
International Journal of Engineering and Emerging Technology, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 22-25, june 2021.
ISSN 2579-5988.
Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ijeet/article/view/IJEET.2021.v06.i01.p04>. Date accessed: 26 apr. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/IJEET.2021.v06.i01.p04.
Section
Articles
Indexed By
