Kerangka Partisipan dalam Video Youtube Puja Astawa
Abstract
Puja Astawa is one of Balinese famous YouTube content creators. His videos display interactions, mostly informal ones, and they are favored by the Balinese not only due to the humor contains in the videos, but also because of the moral values and the messages conveyed in the video. Puja Astawa often raised current issues in the society as the topics for his videos. It makes the interactions displayed in the video real-life like and reflects the real life of a Balinese. Due to this real-life likeness, his videos are interesting to be discussed further, especially in linguistics points of view. This study was conducted in order to identify and analyze the type of participation framework reflected in social interactions in the videos. In order to achieve the aim of the study, this qualitative study selected thirteen Puja Astawa’s videos as the source of the data. Those videos are selected based on several criteria, namely (1) the video was uploaded in 2021 until June 2022, (2) the duration of the video is more than four minutes, and (3) there are more than two participants in the video. In collecting the data, documentation method and note taking technique were utilized. The collected data were then analyses based on participation framework theory which is proposed by Goffman. The result of the analysis shows that the utterance uttered by the participants in the videos reflects the participation framework. All of the participants are the animator of their utterance. However, not all of the participants are the author, figure or the principal of their utterance. There are many things that may contribute to this finding, one of them in the nature of the video which is a scripted interaction
Downloads
References
Dynel, M. 2014. Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Internaction. Journal of Pragmatics Vol 73 pp. 37 – 52.
Gerhardt, Cornelia, Volker, Eisenlauer & Maximiliane Frobenius. 2014. Editorial: Participation framework revisited: (New) media and their audiences/users. Journal of Pragmatics 72, 1-4.
Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Goodwin, Charles, 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York.
Istiani, A.N., & Widhiyatmoko, Y.Y. 2020. Analisis Wacana Kritis sebagai Refleksi Terbalik Perilaku Negatif pada Tayangan Youtube. Jurnal Komunika Vol 3 No 2. Diunduh dari: http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/komunika
Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. 2012. Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable Design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research.
Marks. A.R. 2012. Participation Framework and Footing Shifts in an Interpreted Academic Meeting. Journal of Interpretation Colume 22 No 1. Diunduh dari: https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/joi/vol22/iss1/4
Putri, S.K., & Gautama, M.I. 2022. Interaksi Sosial di Dunia Digital (Analisis Wacana Kritis terhadap Kolom Komentar Podcast Close the Door di Channel Youtube Deddy Corbuzier). Journal Perspektif: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi dan Pendidikan Volume 5 Nomor 2 pp 180 – 189. Diunduh dari: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v5i2.611
Steviasari, P.C. 2020. Retorika Dakwah Ustadz Abdul Somad (Analisis Wacana Terhadap Youtube Ustadz Abdul Somad). Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RnD. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wiharja, I.A. 2019. Suara Miring Konten YouTube Channel Deddy Corbuzier di Era Society (Analisis Wacana Kritis). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa (Semiba) 2019.