Studi Komparatif Onomatope Benda Mati Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Jawa

  • Teguh Santoso UNW
  • Althaf Gauhar Auliawan Universitas Ngudi Waluyo-Kabupaten Semarang

Abstract

This research is entitled ‘‘Comparative Study of Inanimate Onomatopoeic Studies in Japanese and Javanese Language’’. This study uses a qualitative method with a reference to a comparative study approach. The data used in this study came from various mixed data, including the novel Emas Sumawur, Panjebar Spirit magazine and the Japanese Yonkoma comic. The data collection in this study used a descriptive approach. The descriptive research method used is the study of Sudaryanto


Onomatopoeia in Japanese is divided into two types, namely: giongo (words that imitate the sound of living things or sounds that come out of inanimate objects) and gitaigo (words that directly describe the state of sound). In Javanese, onomatopoeia are words that are formed based on imitation of sounds in the natural surroundings and sounds of certain inanimate objects. In this study, because the number of Japanese onomatopoeia is the highest compared to Javanese, this onomatopoeic research is only limited to words based on imitation of sounds on inanimate objects. In this study, the description of the comparative study used the study of Tarigan, while the onomatopoeic description of inanimate objects used the study of Akimoto (2002) and Mulyani


This study aims to obtain a description of the differences or similarities of onomatopoeic inanimate objects in Japanese and Javanese based on data findings. The results of the research on inanimate objects in Japanese and Javanese, there are 16 data to find out how the differences or similarities of the onomatopoeia are.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akimoto, Miharu. 2002. Yoku Wakaru Goi. Tokyou: ALC.

Assaneo, MF, dkk. The Anatomy of Onomatopoeia. Plos one, Vol: 6.No.12

Fukuda, Hiroko. 2017. Onomatope dalam Bahasa Jepang. Jakarta: Kesaint Blanc.

Mulyani, Isna Siti. 2014. Onomatope dalam Novel Emas Sumawur Ing Baluwarti Karya Partini B. Skripsi: Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo.

Maki, Okumura & Kamabuchi Yuuko. 2008. Nihongo Tango Doriru, Giongo Gitaigo. Tokyo: ASK Publishing.

Mataram, Rio. 1997. Cupu Manik Astagina. Surakarta: Pustaka Baru.

Matsuoka, Hiroshi. 2000. Shokyuu o Oshieru Hito no Tame no Nihongo Bunpoo
Handobukku. Tokyo: Suriiee Nettowaaku

Partini, B, 2010. Emas Sumuwur ing Baluarti. Yogyakarta: Pura Pustaka.

Purwani, dkk. 2010. Analisis Onomatope pada Dongeng Bahasa Jepang. JPBJ, Vol: 6 No.2.

Sudaryanto. 2015. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Supangat, Nur Aini Satyani Putri. 2015. Analisis Kontrastif Onomatope Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Jawa. Skripsi: Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1992. Pengajaran Analisis Kontrastif Berbahasa. Bandung:
Angkasa.

The Japan Foundation. Manga de Onomatope. https://www.jpf.go.jp/j/project/japanese/teach/tsushin/hint/201201.html. Diakses 21 April 2022.

Yonkoma Manga Omocoro. https://omocoro.jp/. Diakses 7 Oktober 2022.

E-Japan Japan National Research. 2007. 4-Koma Manga Onomatope. https://www2.ninjal.ac.jp/Onomatope/manga.html. Diakses 21 April 2022.

Inose, Hiroko. Translating Japanese onomatopoeia and mimetic words. https://www.academia.edu/8327377/Translating_Japanese_onomatopoeia_and_mimetic_words. Diakses 7 Oktober 2022.
Published
2023-08-20
How to Cite
SANTOSO, Teguh; GAUHAR AULIAWAN, Althaf. Studi Komparatif Onomatope Benda Mati Bahasa Jepang dan Bahasa Jawa. Jurnal Sakura : Sastra, Bahasa, Kebudayaan dan Pranata Jepang, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 221-234, aug. 2023. ISSN 2623-0151. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/sakura/article/view/93611>. Date accessed: 17 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/JS.2023.v05.i02.p01.
Section
Articles