Integrasi Mekanisme Tradisional dan Teknologi Modern dalam Resolusi Sengketa Internasional: Tantangan dan Peluang
Abstract
Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi integrasi mekanisme resolusi sengketa tradisional dan inovasi teknologi modern dalam konteks sengketa internasional. Masalah utama yang dihadapi adalah efektivitas metode tradisional yang terkendala oleh perbedaan budaya, hukum, dan kesenjangan teknologi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana teknologi seperti Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), kecerdasan buatan, dan blockchain dapat meningkatkan proses penyelesaian sengketa. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif melalui analisis dokumen dan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa integrasi teknologi dapat meningkatkan efisiensi, transparansi, dan aksesibilitas, namun memerlukan penyesuaian regulasi dan jaminan keamanan data. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk kebijakan dan praktik hukum internasional yang lebih adaptif dan efektif.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315796673
Albin, C. (2001). Justice and fairness in international negotiation (Issue 74). Cambridge University Press.
Brett, J. M. (2007). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries. John Wiley & Sons.
Chiozza, G., & Goemans, H. E. (2003). Peace through insecurity: Tenure and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 443–467.
Daudet, Y. (2008). The Hague Academy of International Law: An Introduction by the Secretary-General. Hague Just. J., 3, 5.
Guiguo, W. (2013). Perspective. Hague Academy of International Law. Chinese Journal of International Law, 175, 183.
H, A. (2020). Hukum penyelesaian sengketa internasional. Sinar Grafika.
Katsh, M. E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital justice: technology and the internet of disputes. Oxford University Press.
Levy, S. (1999). Going With the Flow : Google ’ s Secret Switch to the Next Wave of Networking.
Malcolm N. Shaw. (2017). International law. In An Introduction to International Relations, Third edition. Cambride university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855188.020
Manggala, P., Pandie, P., Aloysius, S., & Jacob, Y. M. Y. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen dalam Pencantuman Label Pangan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. 2(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i1.899
Margolang, F. I., Zahrani, R., Sapriliani, S., & Mushlih, T. (2024). Harmoni multikultutral : keragaman dalam penyelesaian sengketa di asean, uni eropa dan liga arab. Jurnal El Qanuniy, 10(1), 153–169.
McCrudden, C., O’Leary, B., Rigod, B., & Peters, A. (2013). New Voices: A Selection from the Inaugural Annual Junior Faculty Forum for International Law. European Journal of International Law, 24(2).
Merrills, J. G. (2017). International dispute settlement. Cambridge university press.
Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
Nguyen, V. H. T., & Boateng, A. (2015). An analysis of involuntary excess reserves, monetary policy and risk-taking behaviour of Chinese Banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.013
Panese, A. M. S. (2017). Peranan Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Antarnegara. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 5(6).
Roberts, S., & Palmer, M. (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making. Cambridge University Press.
Smeets, M. (2018). Can economic sanctions be effective? WTO Staff Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/176768
Thomson, C. R., & Finn, A. M. K. (2014). International Commercial Arbitration: A Canadian Perspective. Arbitration International, 18(2), 205–218.
Touval, S., & Zartman, I. W. (1985). International mediation in theory and practice. (No Title).
UN Commission on International Trade Law. (2016). UNITED NATIONS UNCITRAL Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution. 1–26. www.uncitral.org
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664.
Albin, C. (2001). Justice and fairness in international negotiation (Issue 74). Cambridge University Press.
Brett, J. M. (2007). Negotiating globally: How to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries. John Wiley & Sons.
Chiozza, G., & Goemans, H. E. (2003). Peace through insecurity: Tenure and international conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47(4), 443–467.
Daudet, Y. (2008). The Hague Academy of International Law: An Introduction by the Secretary-General. Hague Just. J., 3, 5.
Guiguo, W. (2013). Perspective. Hague Academy of International Law. Chinese Journal of International Law, 175, 183.
H, A. (2020). Hukum penyelesaian sengketa internasional. Sinar Grafika.
Katsh, M. E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital justice: technology and the internet of disputes. Oxford University Press.
Levy, S. (1999). Going With the Flow : Google ’ s Secret Switch to the Next Wave of Networking.
Malcolm N. Shaw. (2017). International law. In An Introduction to International Relations, Third edition. Cambride university press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855188.020
Manggala, P., Pandie, P., Aloysius, S., & Jacob, Y. M. Y. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen dalam Pencantuman Label Pangan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. 2(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v2i1.899
Margolang, F. I., Zahrani, R., Sapriliani, S., & Mushlih, T. (2024). Harmoni multikultutral : keragaman dalam penyelesaian sengketa di asean, uni eropa dan liga arab. Jurnal El Qanuniy, 10(1), 153–169.
McCrudden, C., O’Leary, B., Rigod, B., & Peters, A. (2013). New Voices: A Selection from the Inaugural Annual Junior Faculty Forum for International Law. European Journal of International Law, 24(2).
Merrills, J. G. (2017). International dispute settlement. Cambridge university press.
Moore, C. W. (2014). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. John Wiley & Sons.
Nguyen, V. H. T., & Boateng, A. (2015). An analysis of involuntary excess reserves, monetary policy and risk-taking behaviour of Chinese Banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 37, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.013
Panese, A. M. S. (2017). Peranan Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Antarnegara. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 5(6).
Roberts, S., & Palmer, M. (2005). Dispute processes: ADR and the primary forms of decision-making. Cambridge University Press.
Smeets, M. (2018). Can economic sanctions be effective? WTO Staff Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/176768
Thomson, C. R., & Finn, A. M. K. (2014). International Commercial Arbitration: A Canadian Perspective. Arbitration International, 18(2), 205–218.
Touval, S., & Zartman, I. W. (1985). International mediation in theory and practice. (No Title).
UN Commission on International Trade Law. (2016). UNITED NATIONS UNCITRAL Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution. 1–26. www.uncitral.org
Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralized blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Available at SSRN 2580664.
Published
2024-09-07
How to Cite
BASQIAN, Rangga et al.
Integrasi Mekanisme Tradisional dan Teknologi Modern dalam Resolusi Sengketa Internasional: Tantangan dan Peluang.
Pustaka : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya, [S.l.], v. 24, n. 2, p. 250-256, sep. 2024.
ISSN 2528-7516.
Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/pustaka/article/view/117345>. Date accessed: 28 sep. 2024.
doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/PJIIB.2024.v24.i02.p17.
Issue
Section
Articles
