I’m Tired With The Task!: Gambaran Deskriptif Ketidakjujuran Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Psikologi Di Universitas X
Abstract
This study aims to explore academic dishonesty in undergraduate students of Psychology Study Program at University X. The design used is a descriptive study. Sample technique using conventional sampling with a total of 182 undergraduate students of Psychology Study Program at University X. The measuring instrument used is the Academic Dishonesty (ADS) which was compiled by Ampuni et al. (2019) based on measurements of academic dishonesty from McCabe and Trevino (1993) and Stone et al. (2010). The results show that there are some undergraduate students who still practice academic dishonesty, like cheating, unauthorized collaboration, and plagiarism. Besides that, the tendency for academic dishonesty to be committed in undergraduate students of Psychology Study Program at University X is in the very high category when viewed from group norms. The majority of factors that cause undergraduate students to commit academic dishonesty come from internal factors, namely wanting to get higher grades and external factors, namely the existence of lecturers who give many assignments.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2019). Ketidakjujuran akademik in indonesian college students: an investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395-417, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09352-2
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud examination, 4th Ed. Cengage Learning
Anderson, T., & Macquairre, B. (2017). Possible cheating uncovered in popular Harvard computer class. Bostonglobe. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/05/04/possible-cheating-uncovered-popular-harvard-computer class/4Wu2EfzWMEwXveBuuo9qFJ/story.html
Arifah, W., Setiyani, R., & Arief, S. (2018). Pengaruh prokrastinasi, tekanan akademik, religiusitas, locus of control terhadap perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi Unnes. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 106-119. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/22860/10782
Ashari, A., Hardjajani, T., & Karyanta, N. A. (2010). Hubungan antara persepsi ketidakjujuran akademik dan self efficacy dengan perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa (Studi pada mahasiswa Psikologi di Kotamadya Surakarta). Wacana, 1, 58. https://jurnalwacana.psikologi.fk.uns.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/57
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2019). Survey fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia Chapter.
Djie, A., & Ariela, J. (2021). Religiusitas dan ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa kristen di universitas kristen di tangerang. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 33-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348964097_Religiusitas_dan_Ketidakjujuran_Akademik_pada_Mahasiswa_Kristen_di_Universitas_Kristen_di_Tangerang
Fitriani, L. R. (2022). Pengaruh kohesivitas kelompok terhadap social loafing pada mahasiswa di kota banjarmasin. [Tidak Diterbitkan]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin. https://eprints.umbjm.ac.id/2345/
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences, Cengage learning.
Herdian, H., & Lestari, S. (2018). Ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa calon guru program studi pendidikan anak usia dini, Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 3(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v3i2.618
Herdian., Mildaeni, I. N., & Wahidah, F. R. (2021). “There are always ways to cheat” ketidakjujuran akademik strategies during online learning. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/ 10.17309/jltm.2021.2.02
Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Ketidakjujuran akademik among high school and college students. Contemporary educational psychology, 27(2), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1088
Lin, C.-H. S., & Wen, L.-Y. M. (2006). Academic dishonesty in higher education—a nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85–97. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9047-z
Liu, X., & Alias, N. (2022). An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-11-2021-0081
Lubis, B. M. S., Mukhtar, D. Y., & Rola, F. (2022). Perbedaan ketidakjujuran akademik berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan efikasi diri pada siswa SMA Kota Medan. Psikologi konseling, 21(2), 1431-1439. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/Konseling/article/download/41105/19743
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Ketidakjujuran akademik: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232. DOI:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Minanari. (2016). Analisa perilaku kecurangan akademik ditinjau dari pengaruh konsep fraud triangle : tekanan, kesempatan dan rasionalisasi (Studi pada mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas XYZ Jakarta). Journal Quality, 6(23), 320–324. https://feb.moestopo.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Analisa-Perilaku-Kecurangan-Akademik-Ditinjau-Dari-Pengaruh-Konsep-Fraud-Triangle-Tekanan-Kesempatan-Dan-Rasionalisasi-Minanari-1.pdf
Nurkholis. (2013). Pendidikan dalam upaya memajukan teknologi. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(1), 24–44. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/104343-ID-none.pdf
Penilaian hasil belajar. (2016). Pusdiklat Pegawai Kemendikbud. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/17902/1/03.15 Modul Pelatihan TFM bagi Pamong Belajar 05. Penilaian Hasil Belajar.pdf
Pantu, E. A., Karmiyati, D., & Winarsunu, T. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya dan kecemasan menghadapi ujian terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v8i1.9127
Razak, R. A. (2022). Perbedaan kecurangan akademis siswa SMA ditinjau dari jenis kelamin dan jurusan sekolah. Jurnal Psikologi Konseling, 20(1), 1356-1366. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/Konseling/article/view/22843/18883
Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the fraud diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(1), 474-476. http://www.ijbmer.com/docs/volumes/vol7issue1/ijbmer2016070102.pdf
Roig, M. (2006). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. https://www.cse.msu.edu/~alexliu/plagiarism.pdf
Sarita, R. D. (2015). Academic cheating among student: Pressure of parents and teachers. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(10), 793-797. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2015/vol1issue10/PartL/1-10-2-857.pdf
Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539895
Sundaya, Y., Adwiyah, R., Maemunah, M., Yonoki, Y., & Inggrid, R. (2016). Peluang perubahan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Prosiding SNaPP: Sosial, Ekonomi dan Humaniora, 6(1), 599-607. https://proceeding.unisba.ac.id/index.php/sosial/article/view/270/pdf
Supriyadi, D. (2012). Integritas akademik. FKKMK Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://mmr.ugm.ac.id/2012/08/06/integritas-akademik/
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud examination, 4th Ed. Cengage Learning
Anderson, T., & Macquairre, B. (2017). Possible cheating uncovered in popular Harvard computer class. Bostonglobe. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/05/04/possible-cheating-uncovered-popular-harvard-computer class/4Wu2EfzWMEwXveBuuo9qFJ/story.html
Arifah, W., Setiyani, R., & Arief, S. (2018). Pengaruh prokrastinasi, tekanan akademik, religiusitas, locus of control terhadap perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi Unnes. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 106-119. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/22860/10782
Ashari, A., Hardjajani, T., & Karyanta, N. A. (2010). Hubungan antara persepsi ketidakjujuran akademik dan self efficacy dengan perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa (Studi pada mahasiswa Psikologi di Kotamadya Surakarta). Wacana, 1, 58. https://jurnalwacana.psikologi.fk.uns.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/57
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2019). Survey fraud Indonesia 2019. ACFE Indonesia Chapter.
Djie, A., & Ariela, J. (2021). Religiusitas dan ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa kristen di universitas kristen di tangerang. Indonesian Journal for The Psychology of Religion, 1(1), 33-46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348964097_Religiusitas_dan_Ketidakjujuran_Akademik_pada_Mahasiswa_Kristen_di_Universitas_Kristen_di_Tangerang
Fitriani, L. R. (2022). Pengaruh kohesivitas kelompok terhadap social loafing pada mahasiswa di kota banjarmasin. [Tidak Diterbitkan]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Banjarmasin. https://eprints.umbjm.ac.id/2345/
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences, Cengage learning.
Herdian, H., & Lestari, S. (2018). Ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa calon guru program studi pendidikan anak usia dini, Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 3(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v3i2.618
Herdian., Mildaeni, I. N., & Wahidah, F. R. (2021). “There are always ways to cheat” ketidakjujuran akademik strategies during online learning. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2(1), 60-67. https://doi.org/ 10.17309/jltm.2021.2.02
Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It's wrong, but everybody does it: Ketidakjujuran akademik among high school and college students. Contemporary educational psychology, 27(2), 209-228. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1088
Lin, C.-H. S., & Wen, L.-Y. M. (2006). Academic dishonesty in higher education—a nationwide study in Taiwan. Higher Education, 54(1), 85–97. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9047-z
Liu, X., & Alias, N. (2022). An empirical survey on prevalence and demographic differences in academic dishonesty among undergraduates from four public universities in China. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/HEED-11-2021-0081
Lubis, B. M. S., Mukhtar, D. Y., & Rola, F. (2022). Perbedaan ketidakjujuran akademik berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan efikasi diri pada siswa SMA Kota Medan. Psikologi konseling, 21(2), 1431-1439. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/Konseling/article/download/41105/19743
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Ketidakjujuran akademik: Honor codes and other contextual influences. The Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232. DOI:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Minanari. (2016). Analisa perilaku kecurangan akademik ditinjau dari pengaruh konsep fraud triangle : tekanan, kesempatan dan rasionalisasi (Studi pada mahasiswa akuntansi Universitas XYZ Jakarta). Journal Quality, 6(23), 320–324. https://feb.moestopo.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Analisa-Perilaku-Kecurangan-Akademik-Ditinjau-Dari-Pengaruh-Konsep-Fraud-Triangle-Tekanan-Kesempatan-Dan-Rasionalisasi-Minanari-1.pdf
Nurkholis. (2013). Pendidikan dalam upaya memajukan teknologi. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(1), 24–44. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/104343-ID-none.pdf
Penilaian hasil belajar. (2016). Pusdiklat Pegawai Kemendikbud. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/17902/1/03.15 Modul Pelatihan TFM bagi Pamong Belajar 05. Penilaian Hasil Belajar.pdf
Pantu, E. A., Karmiyati, D., & Winarsunu, T. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan teman sebaya dan kecemasan menghadapi ujian terhadap ketidakjujuran akademik pada mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v8i1.9127
Razak, R. A. (2022). Perbedaan kecurangan akademis siswa SMA ditinjau dari jenis kelamin dan jurusan sekolah. Jurnal Psikologi Konseling, 20(1), 1356-1366. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/Konseling/article/view/22843/18883
Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the fraud diamond. International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(1), 474-476. http://www.ijbmer.com/docs/volumes/vol7issue1/ijbmer2016070102.pdf
Roig, M. (2006). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. https://www.cse.msu.edu/~alexliu/plagiarism.pdf
Sarita, R. D. (2015). Academic cheating among student: Pressure of parents and teachers. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(10), 793-797. https://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2015/vol1issue10/PartL/1-10-2-857.pdf
Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539895
Sundaya, Y., Adwiyah, R., Maemunah, M., Yonoki, Y., & Inggrid, R. (2016). Peluang perubahan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa. Prosiding SNaPP: Sosial, Ekonomi dan Humaniora, 6(1), 599-607. https://proceeding.unisba.ac.id/index.php/sosial/article/view/270/pdf
Supriyadi, D. (2012). Integritas akademik. FKKMK Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://mmr.ugm.ac.id/2012/08/06/integritas-akademik/
Published
2024-05-13
How to Cite
FARISANDY, Ellyana Dwi; PUTRI, Irfany.
I’m Tired With The Task!: Gambaran Deskriptif Ketidakjujuran Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Psikologi Di Universitas X.
Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 429-439, may 2024.
ISSN 2654-4024.
Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/107939>. Date accessed: 15 nov. 2024.
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the works authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journals published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
