Submissions | Lingual Journal of Language and Culture

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

Author Guidelines

Before you submit your manuscript, it is highly recommended for you to pre-evaluate it using Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL), an instrument that we developed to help you get the effective time of the peer-reviewing process.

Pre-Evaluation Criteria	Strong (Level 1)	Fair (level 2)	Poor (level 3)
Title: Straightforward, informative, and represents the contents of the article.	5	3	2
Abstract: Concise but at least contain the problem, purpose, method, important findings, and implications of the research.	10	5	2
Keywords: Searchable by search engine, truly represents the intention of research. Don’t use phrases, only words. 5 to 6 keyword is recommended.	5	3	2
Introduction: Directing the reader about the importance of the research. Presenting significant problems, a clear state of the art, gap analysis, and novel concepts to fill the gaps. End it with the purpose of the research.	15	10	5
Method: Clear and replicable. Reveals how research objectives are achieved with the appropriate tools, procedures, and stages.	10	5	2
Results: Presenting experimental or survey data, or any other kind of data depending on the type of research. The results are generally presented in clear and readable tables and figures.	15	10	5
Discussion: Meaningful. Good discussion is written as a dialogue that reveals the progress of the research in comparison to previous researches.	20	15	5
Conclusion: Contains a summary of research results (the most important research finding) that relates with the objectives written in the introduction.	10	4	1
References: Accountable, about 80% of the literatures from primary sources (reputable journals) and up to date (last 10 years). Use reference management tools.	10	5	1
Total score	100	60	25

Decision matrix

Score	Probability
85-100	Most likely to be published with little discussion with Editor/Reviewer
70-84	Possible minor revision (if there are no mistakes in principle)
50-69	Possible major revision
25-49	Most likely to be rejected in the first stage

Disclaimer: The Manuscript Readiness Level (MRL) above is used by authors as a “tool” to optimize the peer-reviewing process. The decision to accept or reject an article for publication in this journal is the authority of Editor based on recommendations from reviewers.

DOWNLOAD HERE