Efektivitas Hukum Penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution Dalam Sengketa Hubungan Industrial Antara Perusahaan Dengan Pekerja

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa Efektivitas hukum penerapan Alterntive Dispute Resolution dalam sengketa hubungan Industrial antara perusahaan dengan pekerja serta batasan-batasan penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution  dalam sengketa hubungan industrial. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif serta pendekatan kasus (case approach) penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas dan batasan penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Putusan pengadilan negeri Denpasar Nomor:2/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN Dps yang ditinjau berdasarkan UU No.30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan UU No.2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas penerapan ADR dalam penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial dapat dibagi atas 2 yakni ; a. Efektif bila ditinjau berdasarkan tujuan diberlakukannya hukum yakni kesamaan derajat para pihak (equality before the law), dan b) Belum efektif bila ditinjau berdasarkan indikator keberhasilan ADR yakni terselesaikannya sengketa tanpa melalui jalur pengadilan dengan prinsip win-win solution. Selain itu, hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa dalam penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial, ADR berada pada tahapan perundingan tripartit.

Kata Kunci : Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif, Sengketa, Hubungan Industrial

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze the legal effectiveness of the application of Alternative Dispute Resolution in industrial relations disputes between companies and workers and the limitations of the application of Alternative Dispute Resolutions in industrial relations disputes. By using a normative legal research method and a case approach, this study analyzes the effectiveness and limitations of the application of the Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Denpasar District Court Decision Number: 2/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN Dps which is reviewed based on Law No.30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning Settlement of Industrial Relations. The results of the study indicate that the effectiveness of the application of ADR in the settlement of industrial relations disputes can be divided into 2 namely; a. Effective when viewed based on the purpose of enactment

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa Efektivitas hukum penerapan Alterntive Dispute Resolution dalam sengketa hubungan Industrial antara perusahaan dengan pekerja serta batasan-batasan penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution  dalam sengketa hubungan industrial. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif serta pendekatan kasus (case approach) penelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas dan batasan penerapan Alternative Dispute Resolution dalam Putusan pengadilan negeri Denpasar Nomor:2/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN Dps yang ditinjau berdasarkan UU No.30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan UU No.2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Hubungan Industrial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas penerapan ADR dalam penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial dapat dibagi atas 2 yakni ; a. Efektif bila ditinjau berdasarkan tujuan diberlakukannya hukum yakni kesamaan derajat para pihak (equality before the law), dan b) Belum efektif bila ditinjau berdasarkan indikator keberhasilan ADR yakni terselesaikannya sengketa tanpa melalui jalur pengadilan dengan prinsip win-win solution. Selain itu, hasil penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa dalam penyelesaian sengketa hubungan industrial, ADR berada pada tahapan perundingan tripartit.

Kata Kunci : Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif, Sengketa, Hubungan Industrial

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze the legal effectiveness of the application of Alternative Dispute Resolution in industrial relations disputes between companies and workers and the limitations of the application of Alternative Dispute Resolutions in industrial relations disputes. By using a normative legal research method and a case approach, this study analyzes the effectiveness and limitations of the application of the Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Denpasar District Court Decision Number: 2/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2021/PN Dps which is reviewed based on Law No.30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning Settlement of Industrial Relations. The results of the study indicate that the effectiveness of the application of ADR in the settlement of industrial relations disputes can be divided into 2 namely; a. Effective when viewed based on the purpose of enactment of the law, namely equality of the parties (equality before the law), and b) Not effective when viewed based on the indicators of ADR success, namely the resolution of disputes without going through court with the principle of win-win solution. In addition, the results of the study also show that in the settlement of industrial relations disputes, ADR is at the stage of tripartite negotiations.

Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute, Industrial Relations

of the law, namely equality of the parties (equality before the law), and b) Not effective when viewed based on the indicators of ADR success, namely the resolution of disputes without going through court with the principle of win-win solution. In addition, the results of the study also show that in the settlement of industrial relations disputes, ADR is at the stage of tripartite negotiations.

Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute, Industrial Relations