Perlindungan Saksi Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Pancasila

  • Muh Sutri Mansyah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • La Ode Muhammad Karim Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • La Ode Bunga Ali Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • La Gurusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
  • Edy Nurcahyo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton

Abstract

Witnesses are one of the means of evidence that can be used in administrative court cases. However, over time, there have been instances where witnesses face threats. Arising from this issue, the researcher is interested in studying and analyzing how witness protection in administrative court cases is addressed from the perspective of Pancasila justice. This study employs doctrinal legal research. The findings show that witness protection in administrative court cases is not yet regulated in Indonesia. Based on an analysis of the Witness and Victim Protection Law (UU PSK), it only provides protection for witnesses in criminal cases. Meanwhile, the Administrative Court Law (UU Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) merely regulates witnesses as a means of evidence and obligates their presence in court. From the perspective of Pancasila justice, justice refers to the balanced fulfillment of rights and obligations. Therefore, witnesses should not only bear obligations but also be granted rights (such as protection). The absence of witnesses in court has implications, such as being forcibly summoned by the police under the judge's order. While the state, through its instrument—the police—forces witnesses to attend court, it does not adequately consider how to protect them in the face of threats. Hence, in the future, witness protection in administrative court cases must be grounded in Pancasila justice and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945). Both serve as the foundation for the development of the national legal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amir, Latifah, Pembuktian Dalam Penyeleaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negra dan Perkara Pidana, Ilmu Hukum, Vol 5, No 2.
Indroharto, Usaha-Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Buku I, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1996.
Johansyah, Pembuktian Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara, Solusi, Vol 17, No 3 September 2019.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar Edisi Revisi, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Cet 5, 2018.
Nawawi, Barda Arief, Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional (Indonesia), Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2012.
Raharjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum , Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
Saristha Natalia Tuage, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Saksi Dan Korban Oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban (LPSK), Lex Crimen, II, 2 (2013).
Setiyani and Joko Setiyono, Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Etnis Rohingya Di Myanmar, Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2.2 (2020).
Yusrizal, Modul Hukum Acara Peradilan Tatat Usaha Negara, Lhokseumawe: Unimal Press, 2015.
Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
MANSYAH, Muh Sutri et al. Perlindungan Saksi Perkara Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Pancasila. Kertha Patrika, [S.l.], v. 46, n. 3, p. 296-307, dec. 2024. ISSN 2579-9487. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthapatrika/article/view/108516>. Date accessed: 07 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2024.v46.i03.p.06.
Section
Articles