Risiko Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi di Desa Simbolon Purba Kecamatan Palipi Kabupaten Samosir Provinsi Sumatra Utara

  • RANDA FAUSTIN SIMARMATA Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana
  • I WAYAN WIDYANTARA Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana
  • I DEWA GEDE AGUNG Program Studi Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Udayana

Abstract

Risk Of Rice Farming Production And Income In Simbolon Purba VillageĀ Palipi District Samosir Regency North Sumatra Province


Rice farming on Samosir Island has the potential to become food self-sufficiency. However, agriculture in the village of Simbolon Purba only produces in one growing season, which is in the rainy season and automatically fails to harvest during the dry season. This is because agriculture in the village of Simbolon Purba only relies on rainwater for irrigating paddy fields. This study aims to determine how the risk of production and the income earned in rice farming in the Village of Simbolon Purba, Palipi Sub-District. The study was conducted in the Village of Simbolon Purba, Palipi Sub-District, Samosir Regency, North Sumatra Province. Sampling was conducted by taking data from the village office and the number of respondents taken is as many as 50 rice farmers who use rain-fed irrigation and sharecropping. The data used in this study are primary and secondary data. Data processing starts from analyzing risk and proceed with revenue analysis. In calculating the risk, the standard deviation, variance and coefficient of variation are calculated beforehand, while for the calculation of income, the revenue and costs are calculated beforehand to get the income. The average grain production at the study site was 5,910.2 kg / hectare with a coefficient of variation of 0.25 so that the risk of rice farming production at the study site was not critical. The average income of rice farming in Simbolon Purba Village, Palipi Sub-District is Rp. 20.396.634/ha/MT Planting Season with an R/C ratio of 2,14, which means the farm income of the respondent farmers, is efficient. The government needs to provide financial assistance for irrigation so farmers can increase production in two growing seasons and at the same time increase income.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. Palipi dalam Angka 2016. www.bps.go.id.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Luas Area, Produksi dan Produktivitas Padi Sawah Menurut Desa/Kelurahan di Kecamatan Palipi, 2017. www.bps.go.id.
Joesron, Tati Suhartati dan Fathorrozi. 2003. Teori Ekonomi Mikro Dilengkapi Beberapa Bentuk Fungsi Produksi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Mardikanto, Totok. 2010. Konsep-Konsep Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Cetakan ke-1. Surakarta (ID): UNS Press.
Mulyasa, 2002. Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi: Konsep, Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung (ID): Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, Ar Raihan. 2018. Analisis Perbandingan Kelayakan Antara Usahatani Padi Organik Dan Padi Non Organik (Kasus : Desa Lubuk Bayas, Kecamatan Perbaungan, Kabupaten Serdang Bedagai).[skripsi].Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Padmowihardjo, S. 1994. Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta (ID): Universitas Terbuka.
Soekartawi. 2006. Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta. Universitas Indonesia.
Soetriono,dkk.2018.Agribisnis Tembakau Besuki Na-Oogst. Malang. Intimedia.
Sutedjo, M. M. 1999. Pupuk dan cara pemupukan. PT. Rineka Cipta.Jakarta.
Published
2021-07-21
How to Cite
SIMARMATA, RANDA FAUSTIN; WIDYANTARA, I WAYAN; AGUNG, I DEWA GEDE. Risiko Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi di Desa Simbolon Purba Kecamatan Palipi Kabupaten Samosir Provinsi Sumatra Utara. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism), [S.l.], p. 291-300, july 2021. ISSN 2685-3809. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jaa/article/view/75923>. Date accessed: 05 nov. 2024.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>