RADIOGRAPH OF THE USE OF PIG’S BONE AS GRAFT MATERIAL TO FEMUR FRACTURE TREATMENT IN DOGS

  • Luh Made Sudimartini Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Udayana University
  • I Wayan Wirata Laboratory of VeterinarySurgery, Udayana University
  • Anak Agung Gde Oka Dharmayudha Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Udayana University
  • I Wayan Nico Fajar Gunawan Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Udayana University
  • Putu Henrywaesa Sudipa Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Udayana University

Abstract

Fracture is one of the cases that may occur in pets, especially dogs and cats. The principle to treatment cases of fracture is repositioned and immobilized in the area of ??the fracture. Large bone damage due to trauma can inhibit healing process and cause bone defects, so that graft material is needed to stimulate the healing process and to fill in the missing bone. This research was aimed to study radiographic imaging in the use of pig’s bone as graft material for the treatment of fractures in dogs. Eight male dogs aged 3-4 months were used in this study and were divided into 2 groups randomly. Group I (control) was 2 dogs who their bone diaphysis femur was drilled with a diameter of 1 cm without giving graft material. Group II was 6 dogs who were drilled as Group I and were given a graft material. Monitoring the progress of healing process by rontgent, was conducted at 24 hours, 2nd week, 4th week and 8th week post-surgery. Radiographic analysis showed that there has been a unification and mineralization of bone fragments in the 8th week post-surgery in the group II with bone density already seemed normal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Becker W, Clokie C, Sannerby L, Urist MR, Becker BB. 1998. Histologic finding after implantation and evaluation of different grafting materials and titanium miro screws into extraction socket : case reports. J. Periodontal. 69: 414-21.
Bigham AS, Dehghani SN, Shafiei Z, Nezhad ST. 2009. Experimental bone defect healing with xenogenic demineralized bone matrix and bovine fetal. Growth plate as a new xenograft: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation. Cell Tissue Bank. 10:33–41.
Finkemeier CG. 2002. Bone Grafting and Bone Graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84: 454-464.
Frost HM. 1989. The biology of fracture healing: An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin. Orthop. 248: 283-293.
Graham J P. 2007. When To Panic About That Fracture Repair. 79th Western Veterinary Conferences.
Greenwald AS, Bodes SD, Goldberg. 2008. Bone-Graft Substitutes: Fact, fictions and applications. 75th Annual Meeting American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. March 5-9, 2008. San Francisco, California.
Harwood PJ, Newman JB, Michael ALR. 2010. An update fracture healing and non union. Orthopedics and Trauma. 24:1. Nannmark, U. and Sennerby, L. 2008. The bone tissue responses to prehydrated and collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone grafts: a study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 10: 264-270.
Larsen LJ, Roush JK, McLaughlin RM. 1999. Bone plate fixation of distal radius and ulna fractures in small and miniature-breed dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc, 35:454-464.
Nannmark U, Sennerby L. 2008. The bone tissue responses to prehydrated and collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone grafts: a study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clinical Implant Dentistry & Related Research 10: 264-270.
Olmstead ML. 1995. Fractures of Bone of the hind limb. In Small Animal Orthopedics. M.L. Olmstead and F.J. paros ed. Mosby-year Book Inc. St. Louis.pp.219-243.
Orsini G, Scarano A, Piatelli M, Piccirilli M, Caputi S, Piattelli A. 2006. Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of the regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone derived biomaterial. Journal of Periodontology 77:1984-1990.
Pearce IA, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG. 2007. Animal model for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review. European Cells and Materials. Vol. 13: 1-10.
Piermattei D, Flo G, DeCamp C. 2006. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and fracture Repair. Fourth edition. Saunders Elsevier. St. Louis Missouri. 63146.
Plata DV, Scheyer ET, Mellonig JT. 2002. Clinical comparison of an enamel matrix derivative used alone or in combination with a bovinederived xenograft for treatment of periodontal osseus defect in humans. J. periodontal. 73: 433-40.
Puricelli E, Corsetti A, Ponzoni D, Martins GL, Leite GM, Santos LA. 2010. Characterization of bone repair in rat femur after treatment with calcium phosphate cement and autogenus bone graft. J. Head and Face Med. 6:10.
Weisbrode SE. 1995. Function, structure, and healing of the musculoskeletal system. In Small Animal Orthopedics. M.L. Olmstead and F.J. Paras ed. Mosby Year Book Inc. St. Louis. Pp. 27-56.
Xu W, Spilker G, Weinand C. 2015. Methodological Consideration of Various Intraosseus and Heterotopic Bone Grafts Implantation in Animal Models. J Tissue Sci Eng. 6(3)
Published
2019-01-24
How to Cite
SUDIMARTINI, Luh Made et al. RADIOGRAPH OF THE USE OF PIG’S BONE AS GRAFT MATERIAL TO FEMUR FRACTURE TREATMENT IN DOGS. Buletin Veteriner Udayana, [S.l.], p. 21-27, jan. 2019. ISSN 2477-2712. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/buletinvet/article/view/31410>. Date accessed: 24 oct. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/bulvet.2019.v11.i01.p04.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)