The Role of Big Five Personality in Intimacy of Romantic Relationship

  • Dwi Putri Ayu Rachmawati Udayana University
  • David Hizkia Tobing Udayana University

Abstract

Intimacy is a core component in every relationship, especially in a romantic relationship which serves as the foundation of love, an important pillar of a healthy relationship, and the root of relationship satisfaction. When choosing a life partner, personality is one of the factors to consider because it’s closely related to an individual’s conflict resolution style and is also indicated to affect an individual's ability to form an intimate relationship with their partner. The research aimed to discover the role of Big Five personality (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, intellect) towards intimacy in romantic relationship. The respondents of this study were between 16 to 34 years old, high school graduate or student, and currently having romantic relationships (dating) in Indonesia (N = 175). Big Five personality is measured by International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Factor Marker (IPIP-BFM-50 Indonesia) and intimacy is measured by intimacy subscale of Triangular Love Scale (TLS). The results of multiple regression analysis using the bootstrap method with 1000 samples show that Big Five personality did not have a significant role towards intimacy in romantic relationships altogether. In addition, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, intellect each did not have a significant role towards intimacy in romantic relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agusdwitanti, H., Tambunan, S. M., & Retnaningsih. (2015). Kelekatan dan intimasi pada dewasa awal. Jurnal Psikologi, 8(1), 18-24.
Ahmetoglu, G., Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(5), 1181-1190. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9515-5
Akhtar, H. (2020, March 1). Berkenalan dengan bootstrapping dalam statistik. Semesta Psikometrika. Retrieved from https://www.semestapsikometrika.com/2020/03/berkenalan-dengan-bootsrapping-dalam.html
Akhtar, H., & Azwar, S. (2019). Indonesian adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation of the big five personality inventory: IPIP-BFM-50. Jurnal Psikologi, 46(1), 32-44. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.33571
Anwar, Z. (2016, February 19-20). Resolusi konflik dalam perspektif kepribadian. Seminar ASEAN: 2nd Psychology and Humanity, 610-615.
Ardiana, V. (2018). Hubungan antara intimacy (Sternberg’s triangular theory of love) dan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga pada perempuan dewasa awal. (Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas (ed. 4). Pustaka Pelajar.
Berscheid, E., & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. Prentice Hall.
Branscombe, N. R., & Baron, R. A. (2017). Social psychology (14th ed.). Pearson.
Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M. (2002). Intimate relationship (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Czyżowska, D., Gurba, E., Czyżowska, N., Kalus, A., Sitnik-Warchulska, K., & Izydorczyk, B. (2019). Selected predictors of the sense of intimacy in relationships of young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4447. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224447
Dariyo, A. (2008). Psikologi perkembangan dewasa muda. Grasindo.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Geukes, K., Zalk, M. V., & Back, M. D. (2017). Understanding personality development: An integrative state process model. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(1), 1-9. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025416677847
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84-96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499-510. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
Heaven, P. C. L., Silva, T. D., Carey, C., & Holen, J. (2004). Loving styles: Relationships with personality and attachment styles. European Journal of Personality, 18(2), 103-113. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/per.498
Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (1998). The psychological infrastructure of courtship and marriage: The role of personality and compatibility in romantic relationships. Dalam T. N. Bradbury (Eds.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (hal. 114-151). Cambridge University Press.
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3

Laurenceau, J. P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238-1251. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203311851
Lippert, T., & Prager, K. J. (2001). Daily experiences of intimacy: A study of couples. Personal Relationships, 8, 283-298. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00041.x
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68-86. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294590
Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Schutte, N. S., Bhullar, N., & Rooke, S. E. (2010). The five-factor model of personality and relationship satisfaction of intimate partners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 124-127. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.09.004
Miller, J., & Tedder, B. (2011). The discrepancy between expectations and reality: satisfaction in romantic relationships. (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Hanover College.
Milojev, P., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6-year cohort-sequential growth model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 510-526. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000121
Olson, D. H., DeFrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2011). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strengths. McGraw-Hill Education.
Prager, K. J. (2014). The dilemmas of intimacy: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Routledge.
Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. Dalam S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (hal. 367-389). John Wiley & Sons.
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. Dalam D. K. Mroczek, & T. D. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (hal. 11-39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 251-259. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.251
Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). It’s not just who you’re with, it’s who you are: Personality and relationship experiences across multiple relationships. Journal of Personality, 70, 927-964. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05028
Schaffhuser, K., Allemand, M., & Martin, M. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 120-133. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1948
Setiawati, L., Nurwianti, F., & Kilis, G. (2018). Pengaruh ciri kepribadian terhadap intimasi pada dewasa muda yang menjalin hubungan romantis. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 8(2), 79-90.
Steinberg, L. (2002). Adolescence (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119-135. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203311851
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. Basic Books.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313-335.

Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., & Rowiński, T. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the IPIP-BFM-50 questionnaire for measuring five personality traits in the lexical approach. Roczniki Psychologiczne/ Annals of Psychology, 17(2), 247-366.
Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (2006). Social psychology (12th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Ubando, M. (2016). Gender differences in intimacy, emotional expressivity, and relationship satisfaction. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research, 4(13), 19-29.
Vukasović, T., & Bratko, D. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 769-785. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000017
Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413-449. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00102
White, J. K. (2003). The five-factor model personality variables and relationship variables: A study of associations. (Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan). Texas Tech University.
Weisskirch, R. S. (2018). Psychosocial intimacy, relationship with parents, and well-being among emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 3497-3505. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1171-8
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2013). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275-293. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.75107
Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Chen, S., Zhang, J., & Zhou, M. (2017a). An exploratory investigation of the role of openness in relationship quality among emerging adult Chinese couples. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(382), 1-14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00382
Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Chen, S., Zhang, J., & Zhou, M. (2017b). The actor, partner, similarity effects of personality, and interactions with gender and relationship duration among Chinese emerging adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1698), 1-14. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01698
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Petherick, J. (2006). Intimacy dating goals and relationship satisfaction during adolescence and emerging adulthood: Identity formation, age and sex as moderators. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(2), 167-177. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406063636
Published
2021-04-30
How to Cite
RACHMAWATI, Dwi Putri Ayu; TOBING, David Hizkia. The Role of Big Five Personality in Intimacy of Romantic Relationship. Widya Cakra: Journal of Psychology and Humanities, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 47-55, apr. 2021. ISSN 2774-9231. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/widyacakra/article/view/69900>. Date accessed: 29 mar. 2024.