KEPRIBADIAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG BERINTEGRITAS BERDASARKAN TEORI EYSENCK

  • Ariesta Handoko Pratama Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana
  • Supriyadi Supriyadi Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana

Abstract

Corruption in government institution has been known by the public and Indonesia becomes one of the most corrupt countries in the world (Ditkumham Bappenas, 2012). Corruption among public service is caused by leaders or civil servants, who fail to suppress their personal desires, fail to work accordance with moral values, and fail to meet up the expected value needed by the public during their services in work field (Rahardian & Budi, 2012). It happened because integrity of the civil servants was poor. Corruption is a reflection of the personality and integrity refers to the quality of a person's personality traits (Nucci and Narvaes in Putra, 2010). Accordingly, personality is being expected as the aspect that determines integrity of individual.


This research is quantitative study through two analysis methods; they are One Way ANOVA and Rank Spearman correlation. The sampling method used is multistage random sampling. Respondents involved 380 government civil servants in Bali. Data was collecting through Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI-A) (?=0.776) that consist of 60 items and civil servants integrity scale (?=0.779) that consist of 21 items.


The result was found the probability coefficient is 0.006 (p<0.01), it show there differences of civil servants integrity between type of personality of Eysenck's Theory. Side that, the result show there correlations between traits of personality, that is activity (p<0.01), sociability (p<0.05), reflectiveness (p<0.01), responsibility (p<0.01), and self esteem (p<0.01) with civil servants integrity. It can be concluded that the traits of personality influence in determine quality of civil servants integrity.


Keywords: Eysenck’s Theory of Personality, Integrity, Civil Servant

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ariesta Handoko Pratama, Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana

Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana

Supriyadi Supriyadi, Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana

Program Studi Psikologi, Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Udayana

References

Ancok, D. (1989). Teknik Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Azwar, S. (2000). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2003). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, S. (2012).Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi kedua. Yogjakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar.

BPS Provinsi Bali.(2013). Data Pegawai Negeri Provinsi Bali.Denpasar : BPS.
Casillas,A., Robbins,S., McKinniss,T., Postlethwaite, B & Oh, I S. (2009). Using Narrow Facets of an Integrity Test to Predict Safety: A test validation study. Garsington Road, Oxford : International Journal of Selection and Assessment.

Collins dan Schmidt (1993) Collins, J., & Schmidt, F. (1993). Personality, integrity and white collar crime: A construct validity study. Personnel Psychology, 46, 295311.

Costa, P.T. and McCrae, R.R. (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dewi, R. (2007). Hubungan Antara Tipe Kepribadian Dai Eysenck Dengan Tingkah Laku Agresi Pada Anak Jalanan Di Rpa Bina Sejahtera Indonesia, Bandung.

Ditkumham Bappenas. (2012). Strategi Nasional Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Jangka Panjang Tahun 2012- 025 Dan Jangka Menengah Tahun 2012-2014. Ditkumham Bappenas.

Elliot, J. (2007, November 18). Ethics and Trust in the Public Sector: Issues in Australia.

Eysenck, H.J., & Eysenck, S.B.G. (1975).Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Ghozali, I. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 20 Ed. 6.

Gregory, R.J. (2000). Psychological Testing : History, Principles and Applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Hadi, S. (1991).Statistik 2. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Hadi, S. (2000). Metodologi Research. Yogjakarta: Andi.

Hall, C.S.G. Lindzey. (1985).Pengantar Psikologi Kepribadian, Non Psikoanalitik.

Higgins J.E, Kleinbaum A.P, & Miller P,. (1985). Design Methodology to Randomized Clinical Trial ; Family Health International North Caro'ina 27709 USA: Research Triangle Park.

John, O.P. (1990) The ‘‘big five’’ factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L.A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York: Academic Press.

KPK. (2012). Strategi Nasional Pencegahan & Pemberantasan Korupsi Jangka Panjang (2012-2025) Dan Jangka Menengah (2012-2014).

Kumorotomo, W. (2007). Citizen Charter (Kontrak Pelayanan): Pola Kemitraan strategis Untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Jurusan Administrasi Negara dan Magister Administrasi Publik, Universitas Gadjah Mada,Jogjakarta.

Kuntjojo.(2009). Psikologi Kepribadian. Kediri: Universitas Nusantara PGRI.

Lavin, D. (1976). Perception of the Independence of the Auditor.The Acounting Review.

Lembaga Administrasi Negara Indonesia.(2009). Integritas dan Komitmen. Jakarta: LAN.

Mayana,& Lina. (2008). Hubungan Antara Trait Kepribadian Berdasarkan Sixteen Personality Factor (16pf) Dengan Integritas Karyawan Pt Bank Xx Di Kantor Pusat.

Mayer,R.C., Davis,J.H., &Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Managemnt Review, Vol 20, pp 709-734.

McAllister LW. (1998). A Practical Guide to CPI interpretation. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting PSychologist Press.

McFall,L. (1987). Integrity, Ethics, pp 5-20.

Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Republik Indonesia.(2008). Kode Etik Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah.

Nasution.(2003). Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Nucci & Narvaes (2008) Nucci, L.P., & Narvaez, D. (2008).Handbook of Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge.

Nurgiyantoro, B., Gunawan, & Marzuki. (2009). Statistik Terapan : Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial.

Ones, D.S. (1993).The construct validity of integrity tests.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.

Paine, L. S. (1994). Managing for Organizational Integrity.

Pasal 3 ayat 1 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 43 Tahun 1999.

Pervin,L A., Cervone,D., John,O P. (2004). Psikologi Kepribadian : Teori dan Penelitian, Edisi Kesembilan. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group .

Priyatno, D. (2008). Mandiri Belajar SPSS. Yogyakarta: Mediakom.

Pryhantoro, E. H. (2011). Capita Selecta : Sosiologi Korupsi. Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra Media.

Putra, M Ghazali. (2010) Membangun Peradaban Bangsa Dengan Pendidikan Berkarakter Moral.Surabaya : Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Airlangga.

Rahardian, R., & Budi, M. S. (2012). Hubungan antara Tingkat Integritas Moral dengan Kecenderungan Korupsi Pada Pejabat Struktural dan Pejabat Fungsional Instansi Pelayanan Publik (Studi Kasus di Dinsosnaker Kabupaten Sidoarjo).Jurnal Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, I.

Riduwan & Sunarto. (2010). Pengantar Statistika Untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan, Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.

Sackett, P.R. & Wanek, J.E. (1996).New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 49, 787-829.

Santoso, A. (2010). Statatistik untuk Psikologi dari Blog menjadi Buku.Yogyakarta : Universitas Sanata Dharma

Santoso, S. (2003).Mengatasi berbagai masalah statistik dengan SPSS Versi 11.5. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media komputindo.

Sugiarto.(2001). Teknik Sampling.Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Sugiyono.(2007). Statistika Untuk Penelitian.

Sugiyono, (2011). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sulistyo & Basuki.(2006). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Wedatama Widya Sastra dan Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia.

Suryabarata, S. (1993). Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suryabrata, S. (2000)Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo.

Suryabrata,S. (2006). Psikologi Kepribadian. Rajawali Pers.

Wanek JE, Sackett PR, Ones DS. (2003). Towards an Understanding of Integrity Test Similarities and Differences: An item-level analysis of seven test. Personnel Psychology, 56, 873-894.

Wisesa.(2011). Integritas moral dalam konteks pengambilan keputusan etis.ITB Bandung.

Yuki, G.A & Van Fleet, D.D. (1992).Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations. Handbook of Industrial & Organizational Psychology, Palo Alto : Consulting Psychology Press.
Published
2014-10-01
How to Cite
PRATAMA, Ariesta Handoko; SUPRIYADI, Supriyadi. KEPRIBADIAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG BERINTEGRITAS BERDASARKAN TEORI EYSENCK. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, [S.l.], p. 74-87, oct. 2014. ISSN 2654-4024. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/25128>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2024.
Section
Articles