PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI AKIBAT PERBEDAAN METODE KONSTRUKSI PONDASI DALAM

  • Budijanto Widjaja Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
  • Sri Ratna Wahyuningsih Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Abstract

This research uses 4 types of piles as the objects, a bored pile, a continuous flight auger (CFA) pile, a full displacement pile (FDP), and a full displacement pile with an expander body, the depth for all piles is 9.5 m. The bored pile, CFA, FDP, and FPD with expander body have the following diameter: 62 cm, 45 cm, 45 cm, and 22 cm. Each pile, which has different construction method, is tested by full-scale static loading, excluding the FDP with expander body, it uses Osterberg-Cell. The research aims to know which analysis method best suits a particular kind of foundation and to compare each pile capacity. The pile capacity analysis conventionally using t-z and q-z curve gives 13%-15% higher estimation than the static loading test result. Analysis using Plaxis for FDP with expander body gives lower estimation than the Osterberg Cell test result.


 Keywords: Continuous flight auger, full displacement pile, t-z curve, q-z curve

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-07-30
How to Cite
WIDJAJA, Budijanto; WAHYUNINGSIH, Sri Ratna. PERBANDINGAN DAYA DUKUNG PONDASI AKIBAT PERBEDAAN METODE KONSTRUKSI PONDASI DALAM. JURNAL SPEKTRAN, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, july 2017. ISSN 2809-7718. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jsn/article/view/32942>. Date accessed: 24 apr. 2024.