SISTEM PENILAIAN KINERJA KONSULTAN PERENCANA DALAM MENANGANI PROYEK PERENCANAAN BANGUNAN GEDUNG

Abstract

Evaluation of building design consultant performance is needed, because
most of strategic decisions and project costs depend on the consultant performance
that is implemented in project design documents. The Analytical Hierarchy Process
(AHP) method can be used as a reference for assessing the consultant performance
in more detail and measurable. The hierarchy of assessment criterions was obtained from the interview in which
the respondents were building design experts and it was combined with relevant
literatures. The analysis using the AHP method was conducted to compare the
importance level of criterion using pair-comparison matrixes. The weight of
criterion and sub criterion were calculated by using eigen vector.
The result of this study indicates that Quality of Design Document is the most
important criterion (41,8%), followed by Relevancy with Term Of Reference
(26%), Time Schedule ( 17,7%), and Design Cost (14,5%), which presented at
level 2. At level 3, Consistency of Design Document is the most important criterion
(13,9%), followed by Constructability of Design Document (11,3%), Accuracy of
Design Document (10,6%), and so on. The last criterion, which has the smallest
assessment weight, is the Goal Achievement of the Preparation Phase (4,6%). At
level 4, Consistency among Engineering Drawing Document, Specification and
Cost Estimate is the most important sub-criterion (6,9%), followed by Rational
Time Schedule (5,8%), Equivalency of Remuneration with Project Requirement
(5,7%) and so on. The last criterion is positioned by Explanation of Construction
Material, which has the smallest assessment weight (0,7%). Based on the
assessment hierarchy, which has been completed with global weight of all
criterions, hence the tables of assessment system for building design consultant
performance can be made. Accordingly, the consultants can be classified according
to their performance levels.