The Odd-Even Effect in The Boards of Commissioners and Corporate Values

  • Ardhi Islamudin Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia
  • Gerrinko Giffari Wurintara Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia
  • Yustrida Bernawati Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Abstract

This article expands the understanding of board of commissioners' characteristics by introducing the concept of the odd-even effect in their structure. The study employs a quantitative research approach to explore this phenomenon. When a board of commissioners is composed of an odd number of members, the decision-making process tends to be more straightforward and efficient due to the absence of tie votes, leading to a more unified perspective. In contrast, an even-numbered board is prone to voting ties, which can introduce diverse viewpoints and potential conflicts in decision-making. Consequently, the composition of the board, whether odd or even, significantly impacts corporate value. Boards with fewer members tend to be more effective, with companies having odd-numbered boards generally exhibiting higher corporate value compared to those with even-numbered boards.


Keywords:   corporate value, odd-even effects, board of commissioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cadbury, A. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Vol. 1). Gee.

Campbell, K., & Vera, A. M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management & Governance, 14(1), 37–59.

Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(2), 70–74.

Damayanthi, I. G. A. E. (2019). Fenomena Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 14(2), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2019.v14.i02.p06

Darmadi, S. (2013). Do women in top management affect firm performance? Evidence from Indonesia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1728572

Deng, X., Gao, H., & Liu, W.-L. (2012). Voting Efficiency and the Even-Odd Effects of Corporate Board: Theory and Evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2112880

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Gao, H., & Huang, J. (2018). The even--odd nature of audit committees and corporate earnings quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(1), 98–122.

Hamdani, M. (2016). Good Corporate Governance (Gcg) Dalam Perspektif Agency Theory.

Harmono, D., & Si, M. (2009). Manajemen Keuangan Berbasis Balance Scorecard. Pendekatan Teori, Kasus dan Riset Bisnis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

He, W., & Luo, J. (2018). Agency problems in firms with an even number of directors: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 93, 139–150.

Hemastuti, C. P., & Hermanto, S. B. (2014). Pengaruh profitabilitas, kebijakan dividen, kebijakan hutang, keputusan investasi dan kepemilikan insider terhadap nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi, 3(4), 1–15.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Masulis, R. W., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554.

Muryati, N. N. T. S., & Suardikha, I. M. S. (2014). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Pada Nilai Perusahaan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 425–429. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/9160

Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2003). The impact of foreign board membership on firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(12), 2369–2392.

Prabowo, M., & Simpson, J. (2011). Independent directors and firm performance in family controlled firms: evidence from Indonesia. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 25(1), 121–132.

Rasyidah, R. (2013). Perbandingan Corporate Governance dengan SistemOne-Tier Board di Inggris dan AS Terkait EfektififasPencegahan Terjadinya Fraud dalam Korporasi. Global & Policy, 1(1), 11–18.

Schellenger, M. H., Wood, D. D., & Tashakori, A. (1989). Board of Director Composition, Shareholder Wealth, and Dividend Policy. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500308

Sudiyatno, B., & Puspitasari, E. (2010). Tobin’s q dan altman z-score sebagai indikator pengukuran kinerja perusahaan. Kajian Akuntansi, 2(1).

Tambunan, M. C. S., Saifi, M., & Hidayat, R. R. (2017). Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan (Studi pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Food and Beverages yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2012-2015). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 53(1), 49–57.

Tricker, R. I. B., & Tricker, R. I. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. Oxford University Press, USA.

Ullah, I., Fang, H., & Jebran, K. (2019). Do gender diversity and CEO gender enhance firm’s value? Evidence from an emerging economy. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(1), 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2019-0085
Published
2020-06-02
How to Cite
ISLAMUDIN, Ardhi; WURINTARA, Gerrinko Giffari; BERNAWATI, Yustrida. The Odd-Even Effect in The Boards of Commissioners and Corporate Values. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 308-316, june 2020. ISSN 2303-1018. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jiab/article/view/56051>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2020.v15.i02.p12.
Section
Articles