SISTEM KELAS TUNTAS BERKELANJUTAN (SKTB) IN GOWA REGENCY; DETERMINATION SOLUTIONS ON STUDENTS DROPOUT

Burhan Burhan; Suparno Eko Widodo; Sutjipto Sutjipto

Burhan Burhan Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Suparno Eko Widodo Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Sutjipto Sutjipto Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Abstract

Education is an effort to improve the quality of human resources. Therefore, improving the quality of education must receive more serious attention. For this reason, it is only natural that policy issues related to improving the quality of education in Indonesia are the main concern of the central and regional governments. Even the foundation of the contextual implementation of education is based on the commitment and policies of the local government and the active role of the community. This research aims to find out how the Sistem Kelas Tuntas Berkelanjutan (SKTB) in Gowa Regency is a solution for completing school dropouts. This study uses evaluation with a qualitative approach with research instruments using interviews, observation and documentation. Sources of data in this study include the Head of Education, Principals, Teachers and Communities. Data analysis using analytical techniques from Miles and Huberman. The results of the study show that with the existence of a policy of a sustainable class system can increase the interest of interest to go to school and continue to a higher level and students can develop competencies according to their interests and abilities. This shows that this policy is certainly one of the alternative solutions in cutting off the school dropout chain because this policy does not recognize the class living system, but instead replaces it with remedial aspects that need to be improved. This is very helpful for parents in motivating children who are educated

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M. F. (2017). Evaluasi Kebijakan Program Pemberian Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (Studi Kasus pada Sekolah Dasar di Kabupaten Mamuju Utara). JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 2(1), 47–64.
Arifudin, I. (2014). Otonomi Daerah Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Madrasah. RisâLah, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 1(1), 39–49.
Hubberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Indonesia. (2016a). Laporan Tahunan 2016. Jakarta.
Indonesia. (2016b). Pusat Data dan Statistik Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Kemendikbud. Jakarta.
Indonesia, R. (2003). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Riant, N. (2009). Public Policy. Jakarta: Media Komputindo.
Rifai, M. (2011). Politik Pendidikan Nasional. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Smidt, W. (2018). Early childhood education and care in Austria: challenges and education policies. Early Child Development and Care, 188(5), 624–633.
Spradley James, P. (1980). Participan Observation. New York: Holt.
Yustisia, T. V. (2015). Undang-Undang No 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Perubahannya. VisiMedia.