Structural Metaphor in Traditional Marriage Discourse of Manggarai Speech Community-East Indonesia: Cultural Linguistic Perspective
Metafora Struktural dalam Wacana Perkawinan Adat Guyub Tutur Manggarai-Indonesia Timur: Kajian Linguistic Kebudayaan
Abstract
This study is intended to investigate the structural metaphor expressions used in traditional marriage discourse of Manggarai Speech Community (MSC). It is also intended to uncover the cultural imagery of MSC expressed in structural metaphors. Thus, this study used Cultural Linguistic Perspectif (CLP) as the main theory and metaphor as the supporting theory. Those theories were combined with the qualitative research method. Based on the data, there were 43 structural metaphor expressions used in traditional marriage discourse of MSC. All structural metaphor expressions have the idiomatic meaning. It depends on culture imagery of MSC. Therefore, based on the structural metaphor expressions, it was also found the cultural imagery that is appearing in traditioanl marriage discourse of MSC such as; cultural, social, magical, ideological, mythical, and biological imagery. Those imageries that appeared in traditional marriage discourse of MSC prove that (1) MSC believe that the God has power to control, protect, guidance, curse ect the human being, (2) MSC believe that the ancestors have power to protect, guidance or even to curse the human being or their children, (3) MSC believe that ancestors are still alive like living human being, and (4) Like other ethnics, MSC desire good life condition when living in the world.
Downloads
References
Chaer, A. dan Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Duranti, A. (2009). “The relevance of Husserl’s theory to language socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology”, 19 (2), 205–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01031.x
Eggins, Suzanne. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistis, 2nd Edition. New York: Continuum.
Erfiani, Y. P. F. (2018). “A Study on Methaphors in Ti’I Ka Embu Nusi Discourse in Rongga Language”. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 18 (1), 123-135.
Fairclough dan Wodak. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis dalam Teun A.Van Dijk (ed.). Discourse an Social Interaction: Discourse Studies a Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage Publication.
Fox, James J. 1986. Bahasa, Sastra dan Sejarah: Kumpulan Karangan Mengenai
Masyarakat Pulau Roti. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Haliday, M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third Edition). London: Arnold.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2008). Pesona Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Lakoff, George. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories
Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moleong, Lexy. J. (2017). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. USA: University of Texas Press.
Sharifian, Farzad. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publshing Company.
Sharifian, Farzad. (2015). “Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Word Englishes, 1-18.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sugiyono. (2009). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suparwa, I Nyoman, dkk. (2021). Tiga Paradigma Analisis Wacana dan Aplikasinya. Denpasar: Swasta Nulus.
Verheijen, J. A. J. (1991). Manggarai dan Wujud Tertinggi, Jilid 1. Jakarta: LIPI RUL.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
