en

  • Ni Made Ayu Sulasmini Institut Pariwisata dan Bisnis Internasional, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Naniana M Benu Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana
  • I Wayan Mulyawan Universitas Udayana
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName## https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2025.v19.i01.p15

Abstrak

This article aimed at investigating the presence of Ganesa statue in the school premises, in terms of the code choice and symbolic meaning. The code choice within  this article  focuses on the language preferences  that it used to communicate the meaning, meanwhile  meaning refers to the physical, material and its symbolic aspects. This is a qualitative research. The data was obtained from  field and library research that further confirmed by an interview with the school authority and priest. It is found that  the signage on the statue is written in Balinese Language by using Balinese script and Latin. Ganesa within this school context, indicates the existence of masculine power of knowledge, displaying aesthetic, and keeping the unworthy away, the statues are also symbolizing the existence of Ganesa as a medium for prayin.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

##submission.authorBiographies##

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Institut Pariwisata dan Bisnis Internasional, Denpasar, Indonesia

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Universitas Kristen Artha Wacana

##submission.authorWithAffiliation##

Universitas Udayana

Referensi

Brown, R. L. (1991). Ganesh: studies of an Asian god. SUNY Press.
Goebel, Z. (2005). An ethnographic study of code choice in two neighbourhoods of Indonesia. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600500113674
Ho, J. W. Y. (2008). Code choice in Hong Kong: From bilingualism to trilingualism. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 11–18.
Kasanga, L. A. (2014). The linguistic landscape: Mobile signs, code choice, symbolic meaning and territoriality in the discourse of protest. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2014(230), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0025
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
Lou, J. (2007). Revitalizing Chinatown into a heterotopia: A geosemiotic analysis of shop signs in Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown. Space and Culture, 10(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206298547
Nichols, S. (2013). Geosemiotics. Routledge.
Piliang, Y. A. (2004). Semiotika Teks : Sebuah Pendekatan Analisis Teks. MediaTor, 5 No. 2(No.2), 189–198. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265040699_Semiotika_Teks_Sebuah_Pendekatan_Analisis_Teks
Torto, R. T. (2012). Participant relationship and code choice in communication: A case of the university community of Cape Coast, Ghana. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1576–1582. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1576-1582

Titib, Dr. I Made. (2003). Teologi & Simbol-Simbol dalam Agama Hindu. Penerbit Paramita
Surabaya
Diterbitkan
2025-01-17
##submission.howToCite##
AYU SULASMINI, Ni Made; BENU, Naniana M; MULYAWAN, I Wayan. en. e-Journal of Linguistics, [S.l.], v. 19, n. 1, p. 167--177, jan. 2025. ISSN 2442-7586. Tersedia pada: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eol/article/view/123302>. Tanggal Akses: 04 nov. 2025 doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2025.v19.i01.p15.
Bagian
Articles