Positioning One-Self as Leader Through a Speech: Mood and Modality Analysis

  • Wahyu Permana Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Elysa Hartati Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Fighting fascism was shown by Charlie Chaplin in his speech in The Great Dictator film. Thus, this research aimed to reveal Chaplin's Point of View, attitudes, and judgments toward people through mood and modality analysis in his speech. The-descriptive qualitative method and Hallidayan SFL theory were used to analyze the speech. The findings revealed that Chaplin used 81% declarative and 19% imperative from 54 clauses. Chaplin did not use interrogatives in the speech to encourage people to fight fascism. Furthermore, the researchers found that Chaplin mostly used 92% modalization probability to describe a wonderful future if the dictator loses. Furthermore, Chaplin used an 8% modulation obligation to depict an action that Chaplin should take. Based on the data, it could be interpreted that Chaplin's position was higher than the audiences. He viewed his audience as being weak. Chaplin calls on the soldiers to stop being the slaves of dictators and refuse to listen to their orders. This study from the speech could provide information for people interested in mood and modality and the meaning of the speech related to the Russia-Ukraine war.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wahyu Permana, Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Elysa Hartati, Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Universitas Mercubuana Yogyakarta, Indonesia

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi 6. Jakarta: Renika Cipta.
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: Second Edition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gerot, Linda. and Peter Wignell. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Great Stabler
Gheyle, N. & Jacobs, T. 2017. Content Analysis: a short overview. Internal research note.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (second edition) London: Edward Arnold Inc.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.
Hartati, E. 2015. The realization of interpersonal negotiation in the conversation. JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), 1(2), 151. doi:10.26486/jele.v1i2.166
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Halliday, M. A. K. (2009). Systemic Functional Grammar: A First Step into the Theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
Nurani, S., Mulyadi, & Sari, R. K. 2022. Mood and modality in Tim Cook's speeches: Tenor of discourse. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v6i2.12791
Nursyamsi, F., Purnama, A., & Hartono. 2020. Interpersonal meaning in Jokowi's speech a case study at Summit Apec. TheGIST, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.53675/gist.v1i1.32
Stubbs, M.1983. Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Yu, H. 2017. Interpersonal meaning of Mood and modality in English public service advertising texts. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Education, Management, Information and Mechanical Engineering (EMIM 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/emim-17.2017.48
Published
2024-06-21
How to Cite
PERMANA, Wahyu; HARTATI, Elysa. Positioning One-Self as Leader Through a Speech: Mood and Modality Analysis. e-Journal of Linguistics, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 254--262, june 2024. ISSN 2442-7586. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/eol/article/view/117171>. Date accessed: 17 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2024.v18.i02.p10.
Section
Articles