HISTOLOGICAL STRUCTURE AND HISTOMORPHOMETRY THE BASIS, CORPUS, AND APEX CAECUM OF BALI CATTLE
Abstract
This study aims to determine the histological structure and histomorphometry as well as differences in histomorphometry of the cecum of Bali cattle at the basis, corpus and apex. For this study the female balinese cattle caecum of 10 (4-5 years) were collected from Pesanggaran Animal Slaughterhouse. Caecum samples taken basis, corpus and apex for subsequent fixation using a solution Neutral Buffered Formalin 10%, then stained using Haematoxillin-Eosin. The results are presented in a qualitative descriptive and quantitative descriptive method. Caecum was composed of 4 layers; tunica mucosa, submucosa, muscularis and serosa. Histomorphometrical measurements showed that the thickness of the mucosa, submucosa, muscularis and serosa in the basis part were 376,87±34,411?m, 1508,73±349,022?m, 2767,76±609,698?m, 199,95±21,502?m, in the corpus were 380,36±51,501?m, 739,28±129,371?m, 2287,66±303,987?m, 328,19±77,468?m and in the apex were 407,05±63,902?m, 615,57±205,736?m, 2730,51±332,044?m, 297,82±51,211?m. Histomorphometry of the tunica mucosa, tunica submucosa, tunica muscularis and tunica serosa showed that there was no significant difference in the tunica mucosa at the basis, corpus and apex, the thickness of the tunica submucosa at the basis was thicker than the corpus and apex, and the thickness of the tunica muscularis at the basis and apex. thicker than the corpus, there is no significant difference in the serous tunica at the basis, corpus and apex. It is necessary to do macro and micro anatomical research on the large intestine of Bali cattle by paying attention to rearing management, differentiating age, sex, and doing special coloring.
Downloads
References
Akoso BT. 2002. Kesehatan unggas. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Althnaian TA, Alkhodair KM, Albokhadaim IF, Abdelhay MA, Homeida AM, El Bahr SM. 2013. Histological and histochemical investigation on duodenum of dromedary camels (camelus dromedarius). Sci. Int. 1(6): 217-221.
Bello A, Danmaigoro A. 2019. Histomorphological observation of the small intestine of red sokoto goat. MOJ Anatomy Physiol. 6(3) 80-84
Dellman HD, Brown EM. 1987. Textbook of veterinary histology. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
Deplancke B, Gaskins HR. 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nut. 73: 1131S-141S.
DGLS (Directorate Generale of Livestock). 2003. National report on animal genetic resources Indonesia. Directorate Generale of Livestock Services, Directorate of Livestock Breeding. Indonesia.
Eroschenko VP. 2015. Atlas histologi difiore dengan korelasi fungsional (diterjemahkan oleh Brahm U. Pendit). Edisi 12. EGC, Penerbit Buku Kedokteran, Jakarta
Firmansyah A, Masyitha D, Zainuddin, Fitriyani, Balqis U, Gani FA, Azhar. 2019. Histological study small intestine of Aceh Cattle. JIMVET. 3(4):189-196.
Greenwood B, Davison JS. 1987. The relationship between gastrointestinal motility and secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 252: G1–G7.
Hall JB. 2009. Nutrition and feeding of the cow-calf herd: digestive system of the cow. Virginian Polytechnik Institute And State University, Petersburg.
Igwebuike UM, Eze UU. 2010. Morphological characteristics of the small intestine of the african pied crow (corvus albus). Anim. Res. Int. 7(1): 1116-1120.
Jacob J, Pescatore T, Cantor A. 2011. Avian digestive system. Lexington (US): Cooperative Extention Service, University of Kentucky.
Janqueire LC, Carneiro J, Kelly RO. 2005. Histologi dasar. (Diterjemahkan oleh Jan Tambayong). Edisi 8. EGC, Penerbit Buku Kedokteran, Jakarta.
Jung C, Hugot JP, Barreau F. 2010. Peyer’s patches: the immune sensors of the intestine. Int. J. Inflam. 2010: 823710.
Kadam SD, Bhosale NS, Kapadnis PJ. 2007. Study of histoarchitecture of large intestinum in goat. Indian J. 41(3): 196-199.
King CE, Robinson MH. 1945. The nervous mechanisms of the muscularis mucosae. Am. J. Physiol. 143: 325–335.
Kiernan JA. 2015. Histological and histochemical methods: theory and practice. 5th.edition, Scion Publishing, Banbury –United King. Pp. 330-334.
Marshall WS, Grosell M. 2005. Ion transport, osmoregulation, and acidbase balance in the physiology of fishes. Taylor and Francis Group.
Purbowati E, Rianto E, Dilaga WS, Lestari CMS, Adiwinarti R. 2014. Bobot dan panjang saluran pencernaan sapi jawa dan sapi peranakan ongole di brebes. J. Pet. Indon. 16(1): 15-17.
Resti AP, Dian M, Zainuddin, Fitriani, Nazaruddin, Fadl A, Gani, Ummu B. 2019. Studi histologis usus besar sapi aceh. JIMVET. 3(2): 62-70.
Saputra DA, Maskur, Rozi T. 2019.Karakteristik morfometrik (ukuran linier dan lingkar tubuh) sapi Bali yang dipelihara secara semi intensif di kabupaten Sumbawa (Morphometric characteristics (linear size and body circle) of Bali cattle that are raised semiintensively in Sumbawa Regency) J. Ilmu Teknol. Pet. Indon. 5: 67-75.
Singh O, Roy KS, Sethi RS, Kumar A. 2012. Development of large intestine of buffalo. Indian J. Anim. 82(10): 1200-1202.
Soeharsono. 2010. Fisiologi ternak. Widya Padjadjaran, Bandung.
Suwiti NK, Setiasih NLE, Suastika IP, Piraksa IW, Susari NNW. 2010. Studi histologi usus besar sapi bali. Bul. Vet. Udayana. 2(2): 101-107.
Usman Y. 2013. Pemberian pakan serat sisa tanaman pertanian (jerami kacang tanah, jerami jagung, pucuk tebu) terhadap evolusi Ph, N-NH3 dan VFA di dalam rumen sapi. Agripet. 13(2): 53-58.
Varol C, Vallon-Eberhard A, Elinav E, Aychek T, Shapira Y, Luche H, Berdesir H, Jörg, Hardt WD, Shakhar G, Jung S. (2009). Subset sel dendritik lamina propria usus memiliki asal dan fungsi yang berbeda. Kekebalan. 31 (3): 502-512.
