Evaluation of the Examination of Public Appraisers and Public Appraisal Service Offices at the Center for Financial Profession Development

  • Ganda Tua Hasiholan Marbun Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Fitriany Fitriany Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

The study aims to evaluate the implementation of the examination of Public Appraisers (PP) and Public Appraisal Service Offices (KJPP) by the Financial Profession Development Center (PPPK) based on factors of top management support, human resources, and Examination Guidelines. The background of the study was the increase in the number of examination findings and complaints against PP and KJPP which showed non-compliance of PP and KJPP with laws and regulations, codes of ethics, and professional standards, so that it can give rise to legal cases. The method in the study used a descriptive qualitative approach through a case study of an evaluation model of data on PPPK and interviews with PPPK employees including the examination team (members, chair, and coordinator). The results of the study showed that the implementation of the examination of PP and KJPP at PPPK had been carried out based on risk and in accordance with regulations and Examination Guidelines. In order to improve, an examination blueprint is needed, increased firmness in imposing sanctions, motivation for the examination team to pass the certification exam, and the addition of provisions and formats for the examination team's work papers in the Examination Guidelines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albi, I., Suyadi, I., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2016). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Pajak Restoran Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penerimaan Pajak Restoran Kota Administrasi Jakarta Barat. Jurnal Perpajakan (JEJAK), 11(1).

Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2), 74-86.

Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J., Beasley, M.S. and Jones, J.C., 2015. Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements. Pearson Canada

Armanza, Arya Hagaganta.2012. “Analisis faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perataan Laba”.Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro Semarang

Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Shannon, L. M. (2014). Signalling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12097.

Birmingham, P., & Wilkinson, D. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. Routledge.

Brophy, M. and T. Kiely. 2002. Competencies : A new sector, Journal of European Industrial Training, 26 (2 - 4): 165 - 176.

Christiawan, Y.J. dan J. Tarigan. 2007. Kepemilikan Manajerial: Kebijakan Hutang, Kinerja dan Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol.1. Mei 2007.

Christiawan, Yulius Yogi. 2002. Kompetensi dan Independensi Akuntan Publik : Refleksi Hasil Penelitian Empiris. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. Vol. 4 (2). 79-92.

Dessler, G.2004. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Alih Bahasa Paramita Rahayu, Jilid 2, Edisi Kesepuluh. PT Indeks, Jakarta.

Dewi, kartika Shintia.2012.”Analisis Pengaruh Roa, Npm, Der, dan Size Terhadap Praktik Perataan Laba”. Skripsi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro.

Elysabet Sry Devi Bruni Simatupang, dkk. 2021. Independensi Penentuan Jumlah Nilai Agunan dalam Perjanjian Kredit yang Dilakukan oleh Appraisal Bank. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam, Vol. IX, No. 1, April 2021.

Galloway, A. (2005). Non-Probability Sampling. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 859–864.

I Made Wirartha. 2006. Pedoman Penulisan Usulan Penelitian, Skripsi dan Tesis. Yogyakarta: Andi. Iman Sjahputra, SH. CN. LL.M. 2002

Ivancevich, John,.M., Robert, Konopaske. dan Michael, T.Matteson.,2007, Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, Jakarta : Erlangga.

Jensen, Michael C. dan Meckling. William H. (1976). “Thery of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure.” Jurnal of Financial Economics. Vol. 3, 305-360.

Maguire, M. and Delahunt, B., 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, stepby-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education

Masyarakat Profesi Penilai Indonesia. 2018. Kode Etik Penilai Indonesia (KEPI) dan Standar Penilaian Indonesia (SPI). Jakarta.

Mathis Robert L dan Jackson John H. 2002. Human Resoursce Management, Alih Bahasa. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.

Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2022. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 141/PMK.01/2022 tentang perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Keuangan 118/PMK.01/2021 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Keuangan.

Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2019. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 tentang Penilai Publik sebagaimana telah beberapa kali diubah, terakhir dengan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 228/PMK.01/2019.

Mulyadi. 2014. Auditing. Edisi keenam. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Nguyen, N. (2018). Hidden Markov Model for Stock Trading. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs6020036

Preffer, J., Soejtipto, B.W. Handoko., T.H., dkk. .2003. Paradigma Baru Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetakan Keempat, Edisi Kedua. Amara Books, Yogyakarta.

Przepiorka, W., & Berger, J. (2017). Signaling theory evolving: Signals and signs of trustworthiness in social exchange. Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation, January 2017, 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472974-018

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2021. Keputusan Kepala Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan Nomor: Kep-28/PPPK/2021 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan dan Pengenaan Sanksi terhadap Penilai Publik, Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik, dan Cabang Kantor Jasa Penilai Publik.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2023. Data Pemeriksaan Penilai Publik. Jakarta.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2022. Laporan Kegiatan Pemeriksaan Penilai Publik tahun 2022. Jakarta.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2021. Laporan Kegiatan Pemeriksaan Penilai Publik tahun 2021. Jakarta.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2020. Laporan Kegiatan Pemeriksaan Penilai Publik tahun 2020. Jakarta.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2019. Laporan Kegiatan Pemeriksaan Penilai Publik tahun 2019. Jakarta.

Pusat Pembinaan Profesi Keuangan. 2021. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan dan Pengenaan Sanksi terhadap PP, KJPP, dan Cabang KJPP. Jakarta.

Rossita, N., & Sukartha, I. (2017). PENGARUH KOMPETENSI, KOMITMEN ORGANISASI, SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL DAN MOTIVASI PADA KUALITAS AUDIT. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 20(3), 2539-2565

Scott, William R, (2015). Financial Accounting Theory. 7th Edition. Toronto Pearson Education Limited.

Simons, H. (2009). Case Study Research in Practice. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Ujiyantho, Muh. Arif dan Pramuka, B. A. 2007. Mekanisme Corporate Governance,Manajemen Laba, dan Kinerja Keuangan. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10. Makassar.

Wibowo. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Ketiga. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.

Wirawan. 2009. Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Yuniar Rachman. 2015. Malpraktik Jasa Penilai Pada Bank Tentang Hasil Laporan yang nilainya Melebihi Harga Pasar. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 1, No. 1. April 2015. Hlm: 42.

Zaky Baswendra, Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi. 2016. Urgensi Peran Appraisal dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet pada Perjanjian Kredit Produktif dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Menurut Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 101/PMK.01/2014 Tentang Penilai Publik. Privat Law. Vol. IV, No. 2. Juli-Desember 2016. Hlm: 97
Published
2024-11-29
How to Cite
MARBUN, Ganda Tua Hasiholan; FITRIANY, Fitriany. Evaluation of the Examination of Public Appraisers and Public Appraisal Service Offices at the Center for Financial Profession Development. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, [S.l.], v. 34, n. 12, nov. 2024. ISSN 2302-8556. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/121024>. Date accessed: 15 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2024.v34.i12.p05.
Section
Artikel