Pengaruh Fraud Triangle dan Religiositas dalam Memengaruhi Niat Korupsi Anggaran Dana Desa

  • Pradhanggi Kusumadewi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  • Siti Mutmainah Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Abstract

Corruption is one type of fraud in Indonesia that must be watched out, because based on international transparency data on January 31 2023, Indonesia's Corruption Perception Index (CPI) in 2022, namely 34, experienced the most drastic decrease of 4 points compared to Indonesia's CPI in 2021. The decreasing score shows that there is a lack of support from stakeholders because it is still slow in responding to corrupt practices. Corruption apparently also occurs in villages, because based on ICW data, since the allocation of village funds by the government in 2015, the trend of corruption cases continues to increase until 2022. The aim of this research is to test and analyze the influence of pressure, opportunity, rationalization and religiosity on intention to commit corruption in the village budget. The research method was carried out quantitatively, by distributing questionnaires to the entire village population in Serang-Banten Regency, totaling 326 villages. The data analysis technique in this research uses SEM-PLS. The results of the study show that (1) Pressure does not influence the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, (2) Opportunity positively influences the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, (3) Rationalization positively influences the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, and (4) Religiosity does not influence the intention corruption in the village fund budget.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, W. M. T. W. (2020). Improving Human Value Through Religiosity And Spirituality In Reducing Corruption Risk. 788–796. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.05.85

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-i4/1823

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. C. (2008). Current Trends in Fraud and its Detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 17(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393550801934331

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination 6e (6th ed.). Thomson/South-Western.

Amalia, S. W. R., & Bhilawa, L. (2023). Moralitas, Kapabilitas, dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Aparatur Desa terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(4), 935. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i04.p05

Anandya, D., & Easter, L. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022.

Ariffin, N. A. M., Hasnan, S., Ali, M. M., & Harymawan, I. (2023). The effect of pressure, opportunity, and rationalisation on asset misappropriation in public organisations: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 13(4), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.v13i4.4943

Awaliah, K. N. (2023). Fraud Triangle Theory: Pendekatan Strategis dalam Mendeteksi Korupsi dan Kecurangan pada Laporan Keuangan Publik. Karimah Tauhid, 2(5).

Ayem, S., & Kusumasari, K. F. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa dengan Akuntabilitas Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 10(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.25827

Bilatula, R., Yusuf, N., & Mahmud, M. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas , Transparansi , Partisipasi Masyarakat Dan Pengawasan Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 326–335.

Chandrawati, N. B., & Dyah Ratnawati. (2021). Studi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Fraud Triangle Theory. E-Bisnis : Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 14(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v14i1.383

Cheliatsidou, A., Sariannidis, N., Garefalakis, A., Azibi, J., & Kagias, P. (2023). The international fraud triangle. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(1), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2021-0103

Da Rato, E. Y., Ardini, L., & Kurnia, K. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle terhadap Kecenderungan Fraud Anggaran Dana Desa dan Budaya Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Owner, 7(4), 3433–3446. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1688

Dewi, N. L. P. I. T., Anggariyani, M. P., Septyastini, I. D. A. E., Gayatri, N. M. S., Sudiari, K. D., & Andika, K. D. (2019). Fraud Triangle di Sektor Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pada Dinas Kabupaten Buleleng). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jinah.v8i2.19877

Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The Evolution of Fraud Theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131

Endahsari, D., Nugroho, G. W., & Nurodin, I. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Pembenaran,dan Kemampuan terhadap Tindakan Fraud Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi Kasus di Beberapa Desa Di Kabupaten Sukabumi). Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntasi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis UNP Kediri 19, September, 551–560.

Febriana, L., & Qurniati, A. (2021). Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Religiusitas. Journal of Islami Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.36085/eltadib.v1i1.1450

Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBS SPSS 26: Vol. Cetakan X. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M. H., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Second Edition). Sage.

Han, J. (2023). Examining Determinants of Corruption at the Individual Level in South Asia. Economies, 11(7), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070179

Hasuti, A. T. A., & Wiratno, A. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Perilaku Korupsi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v22i2.1589

Hildayani, R., & Serly, V. (2021). Pengaruh Tekanan, Peluang, Rasionalisasi dan Nilai Etika terhadap Intensi Kecurangan Karyawan: Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan BUMN. JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI, 3(4), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v3i4.422

Indah Pratiwi, P., & Sari Dewi, R. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparat Desa Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Kecamatan Namorambe Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics , 1(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.54259/ijba.v1i2.69

Khoirin, N., & Junaedi, M. (2022). Religious inconsistency on corruption behaviour among Muslim politicians in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7361

Klitgaard, R. (2005). Membasmi Korupsi (Edisi 3). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

KPK. (2015). Kapita Selekta dan Beban Biaya Sosial Korupsi.

Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2014). Teknik-teknik Statistika dalam Bisnis dan Ekonomi: Vol. Buku 1 (Edisi 15). Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Ma’mun, S., & Mustofa, T. Z. (2022). Karakter Masyarakat Desa Dan Kota: Tinjauan Kritis Ibnu Khaldun Terhadap Masyarakat Millenial. Sinau : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.37842/sinau.v8i2.109

Maji, R., Pasolo, F., Yamin Noch, M., & Sonjaya, Y. (2024). SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Partisipasi Masyarakat Dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa di Kabupaten Keerom. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 7(1), 53–68.

Marlina, E., Rahmayanti, S., & Futri, A. D. R. A. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi, Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelola Dana Desa di Kecamatan Rakit Kulim, Riau. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 11(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v11i1.2517

Mindarti, C. S. (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu Terhadap Kinerja Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. XVIII(3), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i3.286

Monteverde, V. H. (2023). Microeconomics of corruption based on behavioural economics. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(3), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2020-0043

Mumtazah, H., Abdul Rahman, A., & Sarbini, S. (2020). Religiusitas dan Intensi Anti Korupsi: Peran Moderasi Kebersyukuran. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 5(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v5i1.1122

Nguyen, L. A., O’Connell, B., Kend, M., Thi Pham, V. A., & Vesty, G. (2021). The likelihood of widespread accounting manipulation within an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 312–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2020-0041

Noviyanti, P. A., & Adityawarman. (2023). Pengaruh Religiusitas, Tekanan, Kesempatan dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Tindakan Kecurangan (Studi pada Aparatur Sipil Negara di Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 12(3).

Pasaribu, E. M., & Wijaya, S. Y. (2017). Implementasi Teori Atribusi untuk Menilai Perilaku Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(1).

Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire . Pastoral Psychology, 45(5).

Pradini, D. (2017). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Survei pada Narapidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Kota Padang). Repository.Unp.Ac.Id.

Priyastiwi, P., & Setyowati, H. (2021). Kecenderungan Kecurangan pada Alokasi Dana Desa: Analisis Fraud Diamond dan Religiusitas. Kajian Bisnis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha, 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32477/jkb.v30i1.301

Riswandari, E., Zarkasyi, W., Suharman, H., & Dahlan, M. (2023). Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 11, 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.7.021

Rohanisa, D., & Bhilawa, L. (2022). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Diamond Terhadap Potensi Kecurangan Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 5(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.32662/gaj.v5i2.2158

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2015). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Accounting Information Sistem) (Edisi 13). Salemba Empat.

Said, J., Alam, M. M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating religiosity into fraud triangle theory: findings on Malaysian police officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027

Said, J., Omar, N., Rafidi, M., & Syed Yusof, S. N. (2018). Are organizational factors more prevailing than individual factors in mitigating employee fraud?: Findings from Royal Custom Officers. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2017-0087

Samsuar. (2019). Atribusi. Jurnal Network Media, 2(1).

Sandhu, N., & Saluja, S. (2023). Fraud Triangle as an Audit Tool. Management and Labour Studies, 48(3), 418–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X231160970

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business (Seventh Edition). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis (Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian): Vol. Buku 2 (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.

Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2020). Analisi SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis (1st ed.). Andi Offset.

Shtudiner, Z., & Zvi, L. (2023). Religiosity and ethics in the labor market : resume fraud and judgment. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2023-0007

Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting (Fourth Edision). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .

Siregar, A. (2021). Fraud Triangle dan Korupsi di Indonesia. Balance: Jurnal Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Keuangan, 17(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v17i1.2012

Suhartini, A., Robiati, R., Hendri, Z., & Hendarsyah, D. (2021). Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa: Kompetensi Aparatur Desa, Religiusitas dan Pengawasan Masyarakat. Equity, 24(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v24i2.3699

Suryandari, E., & Pratama, L. V. (2021). Determinan Fraud Dana Desa: Pengujian Elemen Fraud Hexagon, Machiavellian, dan Love of Money. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v5i1.11688

Tickner, P., & Button, M. (2021). Deconstructing the origins of Cressey’s Fraud Triangle. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2020-0204

Tondang, I. S. U. B., & Marbun, G. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa di Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi (JIMAT), 1(2), 115–128.

Tuanakotta, T. M. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif (Edisi 2). Salemba Empat.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal.

Wulandari, Prasita, P., Isnani, I., & Syahputri, D. C. (2023). Fraud Triangle Theory dan Perannya terhadap Pendeteksian dan Pencegahan Korupsi di Sektor Publik Pemerintahan Indonesia. ABDI EQUATOR, 3(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/abdiequator.v3i2.71370

Xu, X., Li, Y., Liu, X., & Gan, W. (2017). China Economic Review Does religion matter to corruption ? Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 42, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.005

Yahya, K. K., Yean, T. F., Johari, J., & Saad, N. A. (2015). The Perception of Gen Y on Organizational Culture, Religiosity and Corruption in Malaysian Public Organizations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01227-7
Published
2024-09-06
How to Cite
KUSUMADEWI, Pradhanggi; MUTMAINAH, Siti. Pengaruh Fraud Triangle dan Religiositas dalam Memengaruhi Niat Korupsi Anggaran Dana Desa. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, [S.l.], v. 34, n. 8, sep. 2024. ISSN 2302-8556. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/117100>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2024.
Section
Artikel