Pengaruh Fraud Triangle dan Religiositas dalam Memengaruhi Niat Korupsi Anggaran Dana Desa
Abstract
Corruption is one type of fraud in Indonesia that must be watched out, because based on international transparency data on January 31 2023, Indonesia's Corruption Perception Index (CPI) in 2022, namely 34, experienced the most drastic decrease of 4 points compared to Indonesia's CPI in 2021. The decreasing score shows that there is a lack of support from stakeholders because it is still slow in responding to corrupt practices. Corruption apparently also occurs in villages, because based on ICW data, since the allocation of village funds by the government in 2015, the trend of corruption cases continues to increase until 2022. The aim of this research is to test and analyze the influence of pressure, opportunity, rationalization and religiosity on intention to commit corruption in the village budget. The research method was carried out quantitatively, by distributing questionnaires to the entire village population in Serang-Banten Regency, totaling 326 villages. The data analysis technique in this research uses SEM-PLS. The results of the study show that (1) Pressure does not influence the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, (2) Opportunity positively influences the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, (3) Rationalization positively influences the intention to corrupt the village fund budget, and (4) Religiosity does not influence the intention corruption in the village fund budget.
Downloads
References
Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent For Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-i4/1823
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, C. C. (2008). Current Trends in Fraud and its Detection. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 17(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19393550801934331
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2019). Fraud Examination 6e (6th ed.). Thomson/South-Western.
Amalia, S. W. R., & Bhilawa, L. (2023). Moralitas, Kapabilitas, dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Aparatur Desa terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(4), 935. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i04.p05
Anandya, D., & Easter, L. (2023). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022.
Ariffin, N. A. M., Hasnan, S., Ali, M. M., & Harymawan, I. (2023). The effect of pressure, opportunity, and rationalisation on asset misappropriation in public organisations: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 13(4), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.55493/5003.v13i4.4943
Awaliah, K. N. (2023). Fraud Triangle Theory: Pendekatan Strategis dalam Mendeteksi Korupsi dan Kecurangan pada Laporan Keuangan Publik. Karimah Tauhid, 2(5).
Ayem, S., & Kusumasari, K. F. (2020). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa dengan Akuntabilitas Sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 10(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.25827
Bilatula, R., Yusuf, N., & Mahmud, M. (2023). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas , Transparansi , Partisipasi Masyarakat Dan Pengawasan Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 6(2), 326–335.
Chandrawati, N. B., & Dyah Ratnawati. (2021). Studi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Fraud Triangle Theory. E-Bisnis : Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 14(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.51903/e-bisnis.v14i1.383
Cheliatsidou, A., Sariannidis, N., Garefalakis, A., Azibi, J., & Kagias, P. (2023). The international fraud triangle. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(1), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2021-0103
Da Rato, E. Y., Ardini, L., & Kurnia, K. (2023). Pengaruh Fraud Triangle terhadap Kecenderungan Fraud Anggaran Dana Desa dan Budaya Organisasi sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Owner, 7(4), 3433–3446. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1688
Dewi, N. L. P. I. T., Anggariyani, M. P., Septyastini, I. D. A. E., Gayatri, N. M. S., Sudiari, K. D., & Andika, K. D. (2019). Fraud Triangle di Sektor Pemerintahan (Studi Kasus Pada Dinas Kabupaten Buleleng). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jinah.v8i2.19877
Dorminey, J., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M.-J., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The Evolution of Fraud Theory. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(2), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace-50131
Endahsari, D., Nugroho, G. W., & Nurodin, I. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, Pembenaran,dan Kemampuan terhadap Tindakan Fraud Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Studi Kasus di Beberapa Desa Di Kabupaten Sukabumi). Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntasi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis UNP Kediri 19, September, 551–560.
Febriana, L., & Qurniati, A. (2021). Pendidikan Agama Islam Berbasis Religiusitas. Journal of Islami Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.36085/eltadib.v1i1.1450
Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBS SPSS 26: Vol. Cetakan X. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M. H., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (Second Edition). Sage.
Han, J. (2023). Examining Determinants of Corruption at the Individual Level in South Asia. Economies, 11(7), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11070179
Hasuti, A. T. A., & Wiratno, A. (2020). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Perilaku Korupsi. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 22(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v22i2.1589
Hildayani, R., & Serly, V. (2021). Pengaruh Tekanan, Peluang, Rasionalisasi dan Nilai Etika terhadap Intensi Kecurangan Karyawan: Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan BUMN. JURNAL EKSPLORASI AKUNTANSI, 3(4), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v3i4.422
Indah Pratiwi, P., & Sari Dewi, R. (2021). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparat Desa Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa Di Kecamatan Namorambe Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics , 1(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.54259/ijba.v1i2.69
Khoirin, N., & Junaedi, M. (2022). Religious inconsistency on corruption behaviour among Muslim politicians in Indonesia. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(4). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7361
Klitgaard, R. (2005). Membasmi Korupsi (Edisi 3). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
KPK. (2015). Kapita Selekta dan Beban Biaya Sosial Korupsi.
Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2014). Teknik-teknik Statistika dalam Bisnis dan Ekonomi: Vol. Buku 1 (Edisi 15). Penerbit Salemba Empat.
Ma’mun, S., & Mustofa, T. Z. (2022). Karakter Masyarakat Desa Dan Kota: Tinjauan Kritis Ibnu Khaldun Terhadap Masyarakat Millenial. Sinau : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.37842/sinau.v8i2.109
Maji, R., Pasolo, F., Yamin Noch, M., & Sonjaya, Y. (2024). SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Partisipasi Masyarakat Dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Desa di Kabupaten Keerom. SEIKO : Journal of Management & Business, 7(1), 53–68.
Marlina, E., Rahmayanti, S., & Futri, A. D. R. A. (2021). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi, Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Akuntabilitas Pengelola Dana Desa di Kecamatan Rakit Kulim, Riau. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 11(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.37859/jae.v11i1.2517
Mindarti, C. S. (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu Terhadap Kinerja Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis. XVIII(3), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i3.286
Monteverde, V. H. (2023). Microeconomics of corruption based on behavioural economics. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(3), 716–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2020-0043
Mumtazah, H., Abdul Rahman, A., & Sarbini, S. (2020). Religiusitas dan Intensi Anti Korupsi: Peran Moderasi Kebersyukuran. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 5(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v5i1.1122
Nguyen, L. A., O’Connell, B., Kend, M., Thi Pham, V. A., & Vesty, G. (2021). The likelihood of widespread accounting manipulation within an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(2), 312–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-02-2020-0041
Noviyanti, P. A., & Adityawarman. (2023). Pengaruh Religiusitas, Tekanan, Kesempatan dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Tindakan Kecurangan (Studi pada Aparatur Sipil Negara di Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 12(3).
Pasaribu, E. M., & Wijaya, S. Y. (2017). Implementasi Teori Atribusi untuk Menilai Perilaku Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(1).
Plante, T. G., & Boccaccini, M. T. (1997). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire . Pastoral Psychology, 45(5).
Pradini, D. (2017). Pengaruh Tekanan, Kesempatan, dan Rasionalisasi terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Survei pada Narapidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Kota Padang). Repository.Unp.Ac.Id.
Priyastiwi, P., & Setyowati, H. (2021). Kecenderungan Kecurangan pada Alokasi Dana Desa: Analisis Fraud Diamond dan Religiusitas. Kajian Bisnis Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Widya Wiwaha, 30(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.32477/jkb.v30i1.301
Riswandari, E., Zarkasyi, W., Suharman, H., & Dahlan, M. (2023). Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 11, 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.7.021
Rohanisa, D., & Bhilawa, L. (2022). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Diamond Terhadap Potensi Kecurangan Pengelolaan Dana Desa. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 5(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.32662/gaj.v5i2.2158
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2015). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (Accounting Information Sistem) (Edisi 13). Salemba Empat.
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Karim, Z. A., & Johari, R. J. (2018). Integrating religiosity into fraud triangle theory: findings on Malaysian police officers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 4(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-09-2017-0027
Said, J., Omar, N., Rafidi, M., & Syed Yusof, S. N. (2018). Are organizational factors more prevailing than individual factors in mitigating employee fraud?: Findings from Royal Custom Officers. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(3), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-09-2017-0087
Samsuar. (2019). Atribusi. Jurnal Network Media, 2(1).
Sandhu, N., & Saluja, S. (2023). Fraud Triangle as an Audit Tool. Management and Labour Studies, 48(3), 418–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X231160970
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business (Seventh Edition). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis (Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian): Vol. Buku 2 (6th ed.). Salemba Empat.
Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2020). Analisi SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk Hubungan Nonlinier dalam Penelitian Sosial dan Bisnis (1st ed.). Andi Offset.
Shtudiner, Z., & Zvi, L. (2023). Religiosity and ethics in the labor market : resume fraud and judgment. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2023-0007
Singleton, T. W., & Singleton, A. J. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting (Fourth Edision). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .
Siregar, A. (2021). Fraud Triangle dan Korupsi di Indonesia. Balance: Jurnal Akuntansi, Auditing Dan Keuangan, 17(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.25170/balance.v17i1.2012
Suhartini, A., Robiati, R., Hendri, Z., & Hendarsyah, D. (2021). Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa: Kompetensi Aparatur Desa, Religiusitas dan Pengawasan Masyarakat. Equity, 24(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v24i2.3699
Suryandari, E., & Pratama, L. V. (2021). Determinan Fraud Dana Desa: Pengujian Elemen Fraud Hexagon, Machiavellian, dan Love of Money. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 5(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.18196/rabin.v5i1.11688
Tickner, P., & Button, M. (2021). Deconstructing the origins of Cressey’s Fraud Triangle. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(3), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-10-2020-0204
Tondang, I. S. U. B., & Marbun, G. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Dana Desa di Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi (JIMAT), 1(2), 115–128.
Tuanakotta, T. M. (2018). Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif (Edisi 2). Salemba Empat.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal.
Wulandari, Prasita, P., Isnani, I., & Syahputri, D. C. (2023). Fraud Triangle Theory dan Perannya terhadap Pendeteksian dan Pencegahan Korupsi di Sektor Publik Pemerintahan Indonesia. ABDI EQUATOR, 3(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/abdiequator.v3i2.71370
Xu, X., Li, Y., Liu, X., & Gan, W. (2017). China Economic Review Does religion matter to corruption ? Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 42, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.11.005
Yahya, K. K., Yean, T. F., Johari, J., & Saad, N. A. (2015). The Perception of Gen Y on Organizational Culture, Religiosity and Corruption in Malaysian Public Organizations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01227-7
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.