Reformasi Undang Undang Perseroan Terbatas : Upaya Membuka Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia

  • Adelia Kusuma Wardhani Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Abstract

Indonesia has Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies which regulates the personal liability of shareholders, also known as the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine. Unfortunately, the provisions regarding personal liability for shareholders are not well applied by the courts. This study aims to investigate the weakness of the application of personal liability of shareholders by the Courts in Indonesia based on the benchmarks in Article 3 paragraph (2) of the Limited Liability Company Law. This research uses a normative approach, based on legislation and jurisprudence. The results of this study indicate that there are inconsistencies in the application of personal liability for limited liability company shareholders by the Indonesian Courts due to unclear indicators of personal liability. The United Kingdom is one of the countries that applies personal liability of shareholders consistently by the Court. The indicators owned by the UK can be a reference for Indonesia to reform Article 3 paragraph (2) of the Limited Liability Company Law. This aims to ensure that third parties receive legal protection from the application of personal liability of limited liability company shareholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku
Azizah. (2015). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Malang: Intimedia.
Corradi, M & Nowag, J. (2023). Intersections Between Corporate and Antitrust Law. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2015). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Khairandy, Ridwan. (2014). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Schunke, Martin & Saga, Mareike. (2023). Piercing the Corporate Veil The German Sausage Saga, dalam Corradi M, Nowag J, eds. Intersections Between Corporate and Antitrust Law, Global Competition Law and Economics Policy, Cambridge University Press.
Jurnal
Al-Tawil, Tareq Na’el. (2019). Piercing The Corporate Veil: When LLCs and Corporations Maybe At Risk. International Journal of Law and Management,61(2), 328-344. doi: 10.1108/IJLMA-07-2018-0140
Alanzi, Badar Mohammed Almaejel. (2020). Piercing The Corporate Veil in Various Jurisdiction-Principled or Unprincipled?. Corporate Board: Role, Duties, & Composition, 16(2), 47-53. doi:10.22495/cbv16i2art4
Bull, Stephen. (2014). Piercing The Corporate Veil In England and Singapore, Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 24-40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24872231
Chakraborty, Namrata & Sahasrabudhe, Priyanka. (2017). Piercing The Corporate Veil- An Instance of Abusing Human Rights?. IJLDAAI (National Corporate Law Review Edition), 3(4), 56-66. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4519115
Cheng Tan, Jiangyu Wang, C. Hofmann. (2019). Piercing The Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical, & Comparative Perspective. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 16(1), 140-204. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3254130
Dahal, Rajib. (2018). Salomon v Salomon & Co. Ltd (1897) AC 22 – Its Impact on Modern Laws on Corporations – Selected Studies from The UK and The USA. Available from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3169431
David Parker. (2015). The Company in the 21st Century: Piercing the Veil: Reconceptualising the Company under Law. Journal of Law and Governance, 10(2), 1-12. doi:10.15209/jbsge.v10i2.851
El-Gendi, Muhammad. (2020). Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited: The veil finally pierced?, IALS Student Law Review,7(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.14296/islr.v7i1.5121
Enwukwe, Ndamenem Ejims. (2020). Piercing The Corporate Veil of an Incorporation to Ascertain The Real Actors: The United Kingdom Approach, Port Harcout Journal of Business Law PHJBL,7(3), 1-7. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3868139
Fellin & Santo, Paulus Aluk Fajar Dwi. (2022). Piercing The Corporate Veil : Effectiveness of Alter Ego and Instrumentality Legal Test. Proceedings of the 3rd Asis Pacifis International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2510-2519. doi:10.46254/ap03.20220418
Hakeem, Muhammad., et.al. (2024). Judicial Review of the Application of Corporate Legal Veil in Malaysia and Indonesia: A Legal Comparison. Recht Studiom Law Review, 3(1), 83-93. doi:10.32734/rslr.v3i1.16331
Khimji, Mohamed F & Nichollas, Christopher. (2015). Corporate Veil Piercing and Allocation of Liability: Diagnosis and Prognosis. Banking and Financial Law Review,30(2), 211-243, https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/corporate-veil-piercing-allocation-liability/docview/1675992170/se-2
Khokar, Farqaleer. (2022). The English Judicial Trends in Lifting the Corporate Veil, International Journal of Accounting and Management Sciences, 1(2), 243-250. doi:10.56830/OZVW4086
Kim, Ho May. (2014). Piercing The Corporate Veil as A Last Resort, SAcLJ, 26, 249-257.
Kryvoi, Yaraslau. (2011). Piercing the Corporate Veil in International Arbitration, Global Business Law Review,1(2), 169-186. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1572634
Kurniawan. (2014). Tanggung Jawab Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Hukum Positif, Mimbar Hukum, 26(1), 71-83. doi:10.22146/jmh.16055.
Kusuma, Ng Catharina Enggar&Amboro, Fl. Yudhi Priyo. (2020). Doing the Corporate Business with Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine: Indonesia, US and UK Perspective. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal,3(2), 126-129. doi:10.22225/scj.3.2.1832.126-129
Los Wakins & Hamiisi Junior Nsubuga. (2020). The Road To Prest v Petrodel: An Analysis of the UK Judicial Approach to the Corporate Veil – Part 1. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 31(10), 547-588
Mahadew, Bhavna. (2024). Piercing the corporate veil in Mauritius : a comparative study with United Kingdom. International Journal of Law and Management. doi:10.1108/IJLMA-04-2024-0133
Miller, Sandra K. (2008). Piercing The Corporate Veil Among Affiliated Companies in The European Community and in the U.S. : A Comparative Analysis of U.S., German, and U.K. Veil-Piercing Approaches. American Business Law Journal,36(1), 73-149.doi:10.1111/j.1744-1714.1998.tb01017.x
Moore, Marc. Salomon vs Salomon. (2023). Faculty of Law Univeristy College London Law Research Paper ,19, 1-18. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2438217
Namrata Chakraborty & Priyanka Sahasrabudhe. (2017). Piercing The Corporate Veil- An Instance of Abusing Human Rights?. IJLDAAI (National Corporate Law Review Edition), 3(4), 56-66. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4519115
Nugroho, Sandy Nugroho, et.al. (2020). Implementation of Alter Ego Shareholders and Their Responsibilities According to the ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’ Doctrine in Indonesia, PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt / Egyptology, 17(7), 2515-2526. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/1566
Nyoni, Eneless & Hart, Tinar. (2018). The Concept of Limited Liability and The Plight of Creditors Within Corporate Governance and Company Law: A UK Perspective. Intereulaweast,5 (2), 309-322. doi:10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.11
Pratama, Deny Adi. (2022). Penerapan Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil Terhadap Negara Pada Holding Badan Usaha Milik Negara, Dharmasisya, 2(2), 1061-1068. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol2/iss2/40
Rissy,Yafet Y. W. (2014). Doktrin Piercing The Corporate Veil : Ketentuan dan Penerapanya di Inggris, Australia dan Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,4(1), 1-20. doi:10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p1-20
Santoso, A.W., Ananti, D., & P. Sianturi, M.A. (2024). Application of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Investment Law, International Journal of Politic and Sociology Research, 11,(4), 465-471.doi:10.35335/ijopsor.v11i4.232
Schall, Alexander. (2016). The New Law of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the UK. ECFR, 549–574. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3538410
Shoroye, Badajide S. (2022). Lifting the Corporate Veil for Directors and Shareholders’ Liability: Matters Arising. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 120, 44-55. doi:10.7176/JLPG/120-06
Singh, Vijay P. (2020). The Doctrine of Reverse Piercing of Corporate Veil: Its Applicability in India. Trust and Trustees Journal, 27(1), 108-117. doi:10.1093/tandt/ttaa108
Spotorno, Agustin Ricardo. (2018). Piercing the Corporate Veil in The UK: The Never-Ending Mess. Business Law Review,39(4), 102-109. doi: 10.54648/bula2018019
Sulistiowati & Antoni, Veri. (2013). Konsistensi Penerapan Piercing The Corporate Veil pada Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Yustisia, 2(3), 23-33. doi:10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10152
Tan, Cheng Han., Wang, Jiangyu., Hofmann, C. (2019). Piercing The Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical, & Comparative Perspective. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 16(1), 140-204. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3254130
Varma, Ananyaa. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of The Doctrine of Piercing The Corporate Veil: A Perspective From India, Journal of Legal Studies and Research,9(6), 342-351
Wardhana, Gideon Paskha. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Harta Pribadi Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia, Arena Hukum,12(1),19-36.doi:10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p19-36
Wardhana, Gideon Paskha. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas Melalui Indikator Alter Ego dalam Penerapan Doktrin PCV di Indonesia, Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,6(1), 19-36. doi:10.24246/jrh.2021.v6.i1.p19-36
Wardhana, Syailendra Wisnu. Upaya Perlindungan Pemegang Saham Minoritas dalam Perusahaan Holding. Dharmasisya, 1(4), 2159-2172. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss4/37
Widianto, Meh Wih. (2022). Penerapan Piercing The Corporate Veil dalam Menilai Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Pendiri Perseroan Terbatas Perorangan. Lex Jurnalica,19(1), 94-108. doi:10.47007/lj.v19i1.5378

Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2007 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756.
Companies Act 2006
Putusan Nomor 365 PK/Pid.Sus/2022.
Judgment Prest (Appellant) v Petrodal Resources Limited and others (Respondents), 12 Juni 2013.

Sumber Lainnya
Biswas, Liton Chandra. Approach of the UK Court in Piercing Corporate Veil. (2011). Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2438217 (Diakses 1 Desember 2024).
Brinkley, Yasmin K., Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd (1897) : Case Summary and Legal Principles. Available from https://juristopedia.com/case/salomon-v-salomon/. (Diakses 3 Maret 2024).
Hameed, Irshad. (2013). The Doctrine of Limited Liability and the Piercing of the Corporate Veil in the Light of Fraud: A Critical Multi-Jurisdictional Study, Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2282306 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2282306. (Diakses 3 Maret 2024).
Judgment Prest (Appellant) v Petrodal Resources Limited and others (Respondents). Available form https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0004. (Diakses 5 Maret 2024).
Lo, Stefan HC. (2017). Piercing of The Corporate Veil for Evasion of Tort Obligation, Common Law World Reviewer. Available from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2987769. (Diakses 5 Maret 2024)
Mucha, Ariel. (2017). Piercing the Corporate Veil Doctrine under English Company Law after Prest v Petrodel Decision, Allerhand Working Paper. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2962934. (Diakses 4 Maret 2024).
Rahadiyan, Inda. Termuat dalam Presentasi Mata Kuliah Hukum Perusahaan, disampaikan pada 8 Desember 2023.
Vassiliades, George. Lifting of The Corporate Veil. Available from https://citylawtutors.co.uk/law-journal/lifting-of-the-corporate-veil-and-salomon-v-salomon, (Diakses 7 Maret 2024).
Published
2024-12-30
How to Cite
WARDHANI, Adelia Kusuma. Reformasi Undang Undang Perseroan Terbatas : Upaya Membuka Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Pemegang Saham Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Kertha Patrika, [S.l.], v. 46, n. 3, p. 308-329, dec. 2024. ISSN 2579-9487. Available at: <https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthapatrika/article/view/121673>. Date accessed: 07 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2024.v46.i03.p.07.
Section
Articles