Zero-Point Field is the Cause for the Lorentz Transformations and Leads to Find Misconceptions about the Special Relativity
Abstract
Since the introduction of Special theory of Relativity (SR), Lorentz invariance has been a fundamental part of our description of nature. Over the past decades, this (Lorentz invariance) was tested and verified by many research groups and almost no Lorentz violation have been found. However, when we look at the Lorentz transformations, we can mathematically find that they are not symmetrical relations. In fact, the inertial frames are not symmetrical in relation to each other and as a result, there must be a reference frame. If the inertial frames are symmetrical in relation to each other, as the SR argues, some paradoxes and contradictions are happened. Hence, we need to find the misconceptions in this theory. Many researches up to now, focused on Zero-Point Field (ZPF) as a cause for many physical phenomena like mass, inertia, and gravity. One can argue that the Lorentz transformations can be applied only for the inertial frames, moving inside the ZPF and the inertial frames, being at rest in relation to the ZPF, must not bear the Lorentz transformations. In addition, we have found that the SR and General Relativity (GR) are not two separated concepts. They are one thing and the space-time of them are the same. In both cases, it is the ZPF, which curves around the accelerated body or a gravitational mass, causing changes in the body’s length, time, and mass.
Downloads
References
[2] Resnick R, Introduction to Special Relativity, Wiley, New York, 1968.
[3] Einstein A, Relativity: The Special and the General theory, University of Sheffield, London, Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1920.
[4] Michelson A, Morley E, On the relative motion of the earth and the luminiferous Ether, American Journal of Science, vol. 34 (203), 1887, pp. 333-345.
[5] Kennedy R, Thorndike E, Experimental establishment of the relativity of time, Physical Review, vol. 42 (3), 1932, pp. 400-418.
[6] Hafele, JC, Keating, RE, Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains, Science, vol. 177 (4044), 1972, pp. 168-170.
[7] Nagel M, et al., Direct terrestrial test of Lorentz symmetry in electrodynamics, Nature Communications, vol. 6, 2015, pp. 8174.
[8] Sanner C, et al., Optical clock comparison for Lorentz symmetry testing, Nature, vol. 567, 2019, pp. 204-208.
[9] Aartsen MG, et al., Neutrino interferometry for high-precision tests of Lorentz symmetry with Ice Cube, Nature Physics, vol. 14(9), 2018, pp. 961-966.
[10] Kostelecky VA, Topics in Lorentz and CPT violation (Part of The role of neutrinos, strings, gravity, and variable cosmological constant in elementary particle physics), Proceedings, 29th International Conference on high energy physics and cosmology, USA, 2000, pp. 57-68.
[11] Arkani-Hamed N, et al., Universal Dynamics of Spontaneous Lorentz Violation and a New Spin-Dependent Inverse-Square Law Force, JHEP, vol. (07), 2005, (029).
[12] Lodge O (1925), Ether and reality, Whitefish: Kessinger Pub. Co., 2003.
[13] Michelson A and Gale HG, The effect of the Earth's rotation on the velocity of light, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 61, 1925, pp. 140-145.
[14] Lorentz H, Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity smaller than that of light, Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 6, 1904, pp. 809-831.
[15] Einstein A, Ether and the theory of relativity. Methuen, London, 1922.
[16] Dirac P, Is there an Aether? Nature, vol. 168 (4282), 1951, pp. 906-907.
[17] Smoot GF, Nobel lecture: Cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropies: Their Discovery and Utilization, 2006.
[18] Dingle H, The case against special relativity, Nature, vol. 216, 1967, pp.119-122.
[19] Puthoff HE, Advanced Space Propulsion Based on Vacuum (Space-time Metric) engineering, JBIS, vol. 63, 2010, pp. 82-89.
[20] Haisch B, Rueda A and Puthoff E, Physics of the zero-point field: implications for inertia, gravitation and mass, Speculations in science and technology, vol. 20, 1997, pp. 99-114.
[21] Alcubierre M, The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity, Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 11, 1994, pp. L73-L77.
[22] Rindler W., Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, Oxford University Press, USA; 2 edition, 2006.
[23] Dirac P, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, vol. 133 (821), 1931, pp. 60-72.
[24] Castelnovo C, Moessner R, Sondhi SL, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature, vol. 451 (7174), 2008, pp. 42-45.
[25] Ray MW, et al., Observation of Dirac monopoles in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature, vol. 505 (7485), 2014, pp. 657-660.
[26] Cabrera B, First Results from a Superconductive Detector for Moving Magnetic Monopoles, Physical Review Letters, vol. 48 (20), 1982, pp. 1378-1381.
[27] Haisch B, Rueda A, Puthoff HE, Advances in the Proposed Electromagnetic Zero-Point Field Theory of Inertia, Revised version of invited presentation at 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Cleveland, Ohio, 1998.
[28] Mashhoon, B, On the Origin of Inertial Accelerations, Nuovo Cimento B, Vol. 109 (2), 1994, pp. 187-199.
[29] Haisch B, Rueda A, Puthoff HE, Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force, Phys. Rev. A, 49 (2), 1994, pp. 678-694.
[30] McCrea W, Time, Vacuum and Cosmos, Q. J. Royal Astr. Soc., vol. 27 (2), 1986, pp. 137-152
[31] Schwarzschild K, Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie (On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory), Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 7, 1916, pp. 189-196.
[32] Koks D, Does a clock's acceleration affect its timing rate, https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/clock.html, 1998 (Updated in 2015).
[33] Bailey J, et al., Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in a circular orbit, Nature, vol. 268, 1977, pp. 301-305.
