Exclusive Distribution and Non-Compete Clause in Trade: Transnational Agreements in European Union and United States
Abstract
Exclusive distribution agreements are commonly used in both European Union (EU) and United States (US) markets to ensure the efficient distribution of products and services. This article compares the competition legislation in the EU and US and focuses on the differences in the treatment of vertical agreements. This topic is addressed also from an economic perspective and focuses on the possible abuse of dominant market position by international multisectoral companies. This article focuses on the following legal and economic questions: how do competition legislations regulating vertical agreements differ in EU and US and, what kind of possible effects do transnational exclusive distribution agreements have on international trade and competition. In EU law exclusive distribution agreements, even those which include a non-compete obligation limited to five years, are considered as lawful restrictions on competition as long as they fulfil certain criteria listed in the Block Exemption Regulation. EU competition law recognizes the terms of block exemption and ‘safe haven’, whereas the US antitrust law does not regulate any exemptions to vertical restraints. Vertical restraints are interpreted in the US common law of antitrust in the light of the principle of Rule of Reason. An important difference in these jurisdictions is the definition of relevant markets, which is taken into consideration when evaluating the legality of a vertical agreement under competition law. Both jurisdictions emphasize the market power of the producer, but the allowed percentage of market share varies between EU and US and only EU legislation gives emphasis to the market power of the distributor. These differences in competition legislations regulating vertical agreements can lead to conflicts when interpreting the legality of a distribution agreement. The definition of relevant product markets might lead to big international multisectoral companies abusing their dominant position by entering into exclusive arrangements.
Downloads
References
Ezrachi, Ariel, EU Competition Law: An Analytical Guide to the Leading Cases. 2nd edition. Portland, Or: Hart Pub 2010.
Goyder, Joanna, EU Distribution Law. 5th edition. Hart Publishing 2011.
Hesselink, Martijn W., Jacobien W. Rutgers, Odavia Bueno Díaz, Manolo Scotton, and Muriel Veldman. Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts. Walter de Gruyter, 2009.
Hovenkamp, Areeda, Hovenkamp, Herbert. Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application 4th edition, 2017.
Leivo, Kirsi - Leivo, Timo - Huimala, Hannele - Huimala, Mikko, EU:n ja Suomen kilpailuoikeus. 2. uudistettu painos. Talentum 2012.
Murray, Carole, David Holloway, Daren Timson-Hunt, Clive Maximilian Schmitthoff, and Giles Dixon. The Law and Practice of International Trade. Sweet & Maxwell, 2012.
Rodger, Barry, MacClulloch, Angus A, Competition Law and Policy in the European Community and the United Kingdom, 3rd edition. Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 2001.
Van Bael, Ivo - Bellis, Jean-François; Van Bael & Bellis (Firm). Competition law of the European Community. 5th edition. Kluwer Law International cop. 2010.
Whish, Richard – Bailey, David, Competition Law. 7th edition. Oxford University Press, 2012.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
De Ly, Filip. "Non-Compete Clauses in International Contract-Les Clauses de Non-Concurrence Dans Les Contrats Internationaux." Int'l Bus. LJ (2006): 441.
Easterbrook, Frank H. "Vertical Arrangements and the Rule of Reason." Antitrust LJ 53 (1984): 135.
Fugate, Wilburg L. International Distribution Agreements. Antitrust Law Journal 43 (1974): 540-551
Iacobucci, Edward, and Ralph A. Winter. "European Law on Selective Distribution and Internet Sales: An Economic Perspective." ANTITRUST LJ 81 (2017): 47-64.
Incardona, Rossella. "Distribution Agreements under EC Competition Law." Available at SSRN 1185371 (2005).
Martin, Mervyn. "Sole Distribution Agreements in the Context of the General Principles of Free Trade and Competition." Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com. 35 (2007): 77.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. "International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business." Journal of World Trade 30, no. 3 (1996): 5-35.
Raad, Puya. "Effectiveness of EU Law and Policy on Vertical Restraints at Protecting Competition." Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics 3, no. 1 (2013): 119-125. https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2013-0047
THESIS AND DISSERTATION
Chernobrovkin, Alexander. “International Distribution and Agency Agreements in Russian Law and Practice in Comparison to the European Approach.” Master Thesis, Advanced Studies in European Law, Ghent University Law School, July 2011.
Gajin, Dragan. “Antitrust Aspects of Exclusive Distribution Agreements.” Dissertation of Doctor of Juridical Science, Central European University Department of Legal Studies, Budapest, 2011.
Macedo, Inês Silva. “Distribution Agreements: Ban on Internet Sales-Towards a More Economic Based Approach." Master Thesis, Portuguese Catholic University Faculty of Law, Oporto School, May 2017.
Hanni, Noona. “Exclusive Transnational Distribution Agreements and Non-Compete Clauses in Trade Between EU and US”. Bachelors Thesis, University of Turku, Faculty of Law, 2019.
LEGAL INSTRUMENT
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
Commissions Regulation (EU) No. 330/2010 of 20 April 2010 on the Application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to Categories of Vertical Agreements and Concerted Practices (Block Exemption Regulation)
European Commissions Guidelines on Vertical Restraints (2010/C 130/01) (Vertical Guidelines)
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy 2010
Commissions Notice on the Definition of Relevant Market for the Purposes of Community Competition Law (97/C 372 /03)
CASE LAW
C-56/65 - Société Technique Minière v Maschinenbau Ulm, Court of Appeal in Paris 1966
C-85/76 Hoffman-La Roche and Co v Commission 1979
Commissions decision 2003/675 Nintendo
Microsoft, 253 F.3d at 58 and Green Paper on Vertical Restraints in EC Competition Policy 1997
United States v. Imperial Chern. Indust., Ltd, 1952
United States v Bausch and Lomb Optical co, 321 U.S 707 (1944)
Cont’l TV v GTE Sylvania Inc. 433 US 1977
Valley Liquors Inc, v Renfield Imps. Ltd., 678 F.2d 742, 745, 7th Cir. 1982
Tampa Elec. Co. v. Nashville Coal Co., 365 U.S. 320, 327-28 (1961)
Barr Labs., Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 978 F.2d 98, 111 (3d Cir. 1992)
Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. Case C-381/98
Innovation Ventures LLC v. Liquid Manufacturing LLC, 315519 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014)
United States v Arnold Schwinn and Company 1967
Apani Southwest, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, 300 F.3d 620, 625 (5th Cir. 2002)
Graphic Products Distributors, Inc. v. Itek Corp., 717 F.2d 1560, 1570 (11th Cir.1983)
Rothery Storage & Van Co. v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc., 792 F.2d 210, 221 (D.C.Cir.1986)
Domed Stadium, 732 F.2d at 490.
WEBSITE CONTENT
James C. Cooper, Luke M. Froeb, Daniel P. O’Brien, Michael G. Vita, A Comparative Study of United States and European Union Approaches to Vertical Policy. www2.owen.vanderbilt.edu/lukefroeb/froeb.papers/vertical/2006.GMU.pdf
Mitnick, Joel, Karen Katzmerzak, Peter K Houston, Vertical Agreements United States. Sidley Austin LLP. www.gettingthedealthrough.com/area/41/jurisdiction/23/vertical-agreements-2017-united-states/
Harrison, Patrick J, Vertical Agreements. Law and Business research 2018. www.sidley.com/-/media/publications/va2018usa.pdf
Miller Canfield. Michigan Supreme Court Makes Commercial Non-Compete Agreements Easier to Enforce. www.millercanfield.com/newsletter-478.html?click_source=sitepilot07!2718!c3VibWlzc2lvbnNAbGV4b2xvZ3kuY29t
Slaughter and May. the EU Competition Rules on Vertical Agreements. https://www.slaughterandmay.com/media/64575/the-eu-competition-rules-on-vertical-agreements.pdf
Arnold, David, Seven Rules of International Distribution, Harvard Business Review November-December 2000 issue. www.hbr.org/2000/11/seven-rules-of-international-distribution
OECD. Glossary of Statistical Terms. www.stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=3153
European Commission. Delivering for Consumer: Abuse of A Dominant Position. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consumers/abuse_en.html
OTHER DOCUMENT
Benguria, Felipe. Production and Distribution in International Trade: Evidence from Matched Exporter-Importer Data. Job Market Paper 2013.
